School Funding Reform, Property Tax Reduction, Growing Nebraska’s Livestock Sector Top Farm Bureau’s 2016 Legislative Priorities
Reforms to how Nebraska funds schools, reducing property taxes and growing Nebraska’s livestock sector are among the top legislative priorities for the Nebraska Farm Bureau heading into the 2016 legislative session, said Nebraska Farm Bureau President Steve Nelson, Jan. 6.
“Addressing the imbalance in how Nebraska funds schools is vital to moving Nebraskans toward meaningful reductions in property taxes. We’re committed to working with Nebraska lawmakers to find ways to continue quality education opportunities for Nebraska students and doing so in a way that doesn’t rely so heavily on Nebraska property tax payers to shoulder that responsibility,” said Nelson.
To balance how Nebraska funds schools delegates, at Nebraska Farm Bureau’s annual meeting in December adopted policy supporting efforts to limit property tax collections to 40 percent of an individual K-12 school district’s general fund expenditures, leaving the rest of the school’s funding to come from other sources.
“We’ll be focused on finding ways to move toward the 40 percent target. Addressing school funding and property taxes is our top priority for the 2016 legislative session,” said Nelson.
In addition to addressing tax issues, Farm Bureau will also focus on efforts to bolster Nebraska’s economy by supporting work to promote growth and expansion of Nebraska’s livestock industry.
“Livestock production is a cornerstone of our state’s economy. We can do more to improve the climate for farm and ranch families who want to use livestock as a means to diversify and strengthen their operations. We’ll focus on legislation that gives livestock producers the tools to grow and to keep Nebraska competitive with other livestock producing states, including expanding opportunities for custom livestock feeding arrangements between farmers and livestock processors,” said Nelson.
Farm Bureau’s other priorities for the session include ensuring Nebraska continues to work toward water use and water management policies that recognize the importance of water resources to agriculture.
“The continued efforts of Nebraskans to find win-win solutions in managing our water resources is vital to agriculture. While other states have struggled to manage this vital resource, Nebraska continues to lead on water initiatives. Issues related to water management will continue to be a priority for us this session to make sure farmers and ranchers are well represented and have a voice in water legislation discussions,” said Nelson.
Nelson also pointed to agriculture transportation issues as another priority area for Farm Bureau in 2016.
“We need sound state policies that recognize the realities of modern agriculture. Farm machinery and equipment has become larger over the years and it’s vital that Nebraska rules and regulations related to farm equipment and machinery are keeping up with the changes in agriculture and needs of our members. We’ll be working on transportation legislation targeted to keeping Nebraska farmers and ranchers competitive with their counterparts in neighboring states when it comes to agriculture transportation issues,” said Nelson.
IANR ESTABLISHES NEBRASKA STATE CLIMATE OFFICE
The Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln has established the Nebraska State Climate Office within the UNL School of Natural Resources. The office will serve as the primary source of climate information for Nebraska.
By forming a state climate office, IANR is adding resources to help the state climatologist serve the needs of Nebraskans. Initially, employees in the office will be focused on identifying services, monitoring climate and user engagement, especially in the agriculture sector.
"People use climate data for many different reasons so we'll be assessing who's regularly using our data and identifying ways we can better serve them," said Martha Shulski, associate professor in the School of Natural Resources and the newly named state climate office director and state climatologist.
Primary groups the state climate office will support include Nebraska Extension, UNL departments in need of timely weather and climate data for research and extension and a wide range of external stakeholders.
"This is an exciting time for our climate team and an enormous opportunity for us to be putting a critical mass of climate experts together to address Nebraska-centric issues relating to weather and climate," said John Carroll, director of the School of Natural Resources.
The data managed by the state climate office will come from a network of weather stations, termed the "Nebraska Mesonet," at locations across the state. The network is made up of 69 stations that are supported by the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources and individual station cooperators such as some of the Nebraska Natural Resource Districts.
Previously the network was managed by the High Plains Regional Climate Center. However, these operations will transition to the state climate office, which will allow HPRCC to focus on needs for a broader region which, in addition to Nebraska, includes North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado and Kansas.
"Nebraska is a state with excellent natural resources," said IANR Associate Vice Chancellor Ron Yoder. "The Nebraska State Climate Office will ensure that we continue to manage those resources efficiently."
The office will hold a membership with the American Association of State Climatologists, which works to support a society in which climate-sensitive decisions are guided by science-based information derived from historical and current observed climate and scenarios of future climate.
Along with Shulski, others working in the state climate office will be Al Dutcher, associate state climatologist; Stonie Cooper, mesonet technical administrator; Glen Roebke, mesonet manager; and partial appointments for Shellie Hanneman, HPRCC data quality technician; and Eric Hunt, research applications specialist. In addition, several faculty members will have affiliations with the office, including Gui Bagorria, professor in the School of Natural Resources, who models seasonal weather and agricultural crop production as well as extension educators interested in climate.
IOWA CROP PROGRESS & CONDITION REPORT - DEC 2015
Iowa experienced above normal temperatures throughout December, however operations struggled to catch up on fieldwork activities as the month of December also saw much higher than normal precipitation totals according to the USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Scattered reports of unfinished fall anhydrous and manure application were received.
As December came to a close, topsoil moisture levels rated 0 percent very short, 1 percent short, 68 percent adequate, and 31 percent surplus. The east central portion of Iowa reported the highest moisture level with 58 percent rated surplus.
Grain movement rated 35 percent none, 41 percent light, 21 percent moderate, and 3 percent heavy. This December nearly one-quarter of grain movement was rated moderate to heavy, while one-third of the movement in December 2014 was rated moderate to heavy. Eastern Iowa recorded the most grain movement rated heavy for the month of December, averaging 4 percentage points more than western Iowa and 5 percentage points more than central Iowa.
Availability of hay and roughage supplies was 0 percent very short, 4 percent short, 85 percent adequate, and 11 percent surplus. Livestock conditions were reported as difficult at the beginning of December, with cattle producers experiencing muddy pastures and feedlots due to the warmer than normal temperatures and above average precipitation. As December came to a close many livestock producers reported normal conditions as the ground was able to freeze.
Big yields likely from USDA reports
Farmers produced big corn and soybean yields in 2015 that could keep supplies burdensome in the coming year, according to Farm Futures final survey of production. USDA updates its production estimate Jan. 12, when Dec. 1 Grain Stocks and Winter Wheat Seedings reports are also released.
For corn, the magazine estimates the crop at 13.57 billion bushels, less than achieved the past two years but still the third biggest crop ever. USDA previously said the corn crop would come in at 13.654 billion bushels.
Farm Futures survey of more than 1,550 farmers put yields at 169.1 bushels per acre (bpa), down slightly from USDA’s last estimate, with harvested acreage of 80.27 million nearly 400,000 less.
Soybean numbers headed in the other direction, though not dramatically so. The magazine put production at 3.986 billion bushels, a record if achieved, but only 5 million more than USDA’s current estimate. Farm Futures found harvested acreage rising by 280,000 to 82.709 million, though yields of 48.2 bpa were down slightly from USDA’s last guess.
“These numbers wouldn’t do much to change the bearish mood of the markets,” says Farm Futures Senior Grain Market Analyst, Bryce Knorr. “The corn production estimate is a little supportive, but probably not enough to turn the market around on its own. For that to happen, demand must improve.”
Feed and industrial usage could be a little better than expected when grain stocks data is updated Jan. 12. But those gains could be partly offset by weaker exports. Overall Knorr sees 2015 ending stocks at 1.642 billion, down 143 million from USDA’s December report.
In addition to slightly larger supplies, soybean stocks could be swelled by demand that isn’t quite as good as first expected. Modestly weaker crush and exports could result in 2015 ending stocks rising to 492 million, 27 million more than USDA’s December number.
“A huge crop is coming on in South America, and flooding on the U.S. river system could slow late season exports,” Knorr said. “Chinese demand also may not return after the Lunar New Year holidays in February.”
Farm Futures second survey of winter wheat seedings found little overall change, though there were regional shifts. Growers said they planted 39.46 million acres of winter wheat, little changed from levels sown for harvest in 2015. But hard red winter wheat acreage fell to 27.6 million, a 5% drop from 2015. Soft red winter wheat ground rose 20% to 8.54 million, while white wheat slipped around 2% to 3.343 million.
Farm Futures surveyed growers Dec. 11, 2015 to Jan. 4, 2016, respondents received an email link to an online survey.
EPA: Pesticide Harms Bees Sometimes
(AP) -- A major pesticide harms honeybees when used on cotton and citrus but not on other big crops like corn, berries and tobacco, the Environmental Protection Agency found.
In its first scientific risk assessment of the much-debated class of pesticides called neonicotinoids and how they affect bees on a chronic long-term basis, the EPA found in some cases the chemical didn't harm bees or their hives but in other cases it posed a significant risk. It mostly depended on the crop, a nuanced answer that neither clears the way for an outright ban nor is a blanket go-ahead for continued use.
Honeybees don't just make honey; about one-third of the human diet comes from insect-pollinated plants, and the honeybee is responsible for 80 percent of that pollination. Bees and other pollinators worldwide have been in trouble with declining numbers.
Some advocacy groups solely blame neonicotinoids — they works on insects' central nervous systems — and call for bans on the chemicals. Recent scientific studies have pointed to problems and pesticide makers dispute those studies. Europe banned the pesticide class, and then lifted the ban. Top bee scientists have said that class of pesticide is only one of a number of factors hurting bees, not the sole cause of their decline.
Before acting, EPA said it needed more specific and targeted research and this is the first of four planned assessments of risk of specific neonicotinoids. It will be announced Wednesday, but The Associated Press obtained the summary earlier and the chief pesticide official explained the results in an interview. The study was done by the EPA and California's environmental agency, with a similar one done by Canada being released Wednesday at the same time.
EPA analysis of detailed tests found a clear level of concentration of the pesticide imidacloprid, the most common neonicotinoid, in which things start to go awry. If nectar brought back to the hive from worker bees had more than 25 parts per billion of the chemical, "there's a significant effect," namely fewer bees, less honey and "a less robust hive," said Jim Jones, EPA's assistant administrator for chemical safety and pollution prevention.
But if the nectar chemical level was below 25 parts per billion, it was as if there were no imidacloprid at all, with no ill effects, Jones said.
There was a clear threshold at 25 parts per billion of harm or no harm, not really much of a grey area, he added.
The study also found that it was the crop more than anything that determined if it was above or below that harmful level, Jones said. While nectar of cotton and citrus fruits were above the harmful level, the levels were not harmful when it came to corn, most vegetables, berries and tobacco. Other crops weren't conclusive and need more testing, including legumes, melons, tree nuts and herbs.
Also, the controversial practice of treating seeds with the chemical seemed not to harm bees, Jones said.
The nation's top crop -- in terms of production value in billions of dollars -- is corn. And imidacloprid treatment of this crop is not a problem, Jones said. Same goes for hay and wheat, which are the nation's third and fourth most valuable crops. Soybeans, the No. 2 crop, and No. 5 crop almonds are in the still-to-be-determined category. The problem crops of cotton and citrus are No. 7 and 9 in U.S. production value in 2014, according to Agriculture Department statistics.
The study looked just at honeybees, not bumblebees. A 2015 study in the field in the journal Nature found neonicotinoids in general harmed bumblebees, but not honeybees. Jones said EPA used honeybees because they are a good surrogate for all pollinators.
This is a draft of a scientific report, not a regulation, Jones said. After public comments and the report is finalized, then EPA may act.
"The literature is all over the place, which is why we wanted to draft a protocol that we knew would be scientifically robust enough," Jones said.
EPA required imidacloprid-maker Bayer Crop Sciences to run specific tests and then the federal agency analyzed the results for the report, Jones said. Imidacloprid is used under several different names because it is off patent, Jones said.
Bayer has long maintained its pesticides are safe and has found what it considers problems in previous studies. But the EPA only shared the risk assessment summary and provided Jones for the interview on the condition that the EPA study was not shared with anyone before the Wednesday announcement.
University of Illinois entomologist May Berenbaum, who in 2014 was awarded the National Medal of Science, said last year that two 2015 studies in the journal Nature "are more nails in the systemic neonicotinoid coffin." One of those studies showed that bees may even seek out the chemical. Berenbaum, who wasn't part of those studies, said research has long shown that honeybees "display a paradoxical preference for certain neurotoxic phytochemicals, including nicotine and caffeine."
Last year the EPA proposed banning use of pesticides that harm bees — including but not limited to neonicotinoids — when crops are in bloom and bees are being used as commercial pollinators.
Honeybees pollinate more than 90 flowering crops, including citrus, peaches, berries, melons, apples, nuts, avocados, soybeans, asparagus and cucumbers.
2015 DDG Exports Up 9.7% - Ethanol and Biodiesel Exports Rise
Ethanol exports in November totaled 59 million gallons, 34% lower than the same month in 2014, USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service said.
Canada was the top customer in November, taking 23.2 million gallons. The data is based on U.S. Census Bureau inspection data.
Year-to-date ethanol exports are down 0.3% from a year ago.
U.S. exports of dried distillers grains totaled 939,917 metric tons in November, up 49% from the previous year. 2015 year-to-date exports are up 9.7%.
China remained the largest DDG customer for the U.S. in November, purchasing 132,385 mt. Through November 2015, exports to China are up 44% from the previous year.
U.S. biodiesel exports totaled 10,671.8 mt in November, up 16% from a year ago. 2015 year-to-date exports were up 1% from the previous year. Mexico was the largest buyer, importing 5,558.1 mt.
Pork Industry Faces Tight Margin Year
Chris Hurt, Purdue University
Pork producers in 2016 are expected to experience another year of tight margins similar to the year just completed. Pork production is expected to rise by about one percent, but beef production will rise by four percent and poultry by about three percent.
There will be plenty of meat and poultry for consumers and retail prices will likely fall to encourage them to buy more. The global marketplace is also casting shadows on the U.S. pork industry with weak income growth in some countries that buy our pork and a strong U.S. dollar that encourages more pork imports and stimulates pork production in competitive countries.
First, a review of last year. The industry recovered from the PED virus that reduced baby pig numbers from October of 2013 to August of 2014. The impacts of those baby pig losses created gaps in slaughter hog numbers from April of 2014 to February of 2015. This slaughter gap helped create a period of record high hog and pork prices. However, since March of 2015, there has be little impact on slaughter numbers due to PED.
Pigs per litter also bounced back quickly once the disease was controlled. In 2015, pigs per litter set new quarterly records in each quarter. Annual pigs per litter set a new record high in 2015 at 10.38 pigs. This compares to just 9.0 pigs per litter in 2005, a 15 percent increase in ten years.
Hog prices were depressed in 2015 due to a seven percent production increase on a combination of eight percent higher numbers and one percent lower weights. Pork trade was also a negative for hog prices in 2015 as the strong U.S. dollar encouraged more pork imports, especially from Canada. Data currently available on trade suggest that higher pork imports increased pork supplies by an additional two percent.
With seven percent higher production and two percent greater imports, total available supplies in the U.S. were up nearly nine percent. The large supply surge became a concern in the last two months as prices fell to six-year lows that were well below costs of production.
What about 2016? The recent USDA Hogs and Pigs market hog inventory suggest some let up in the large market supplies in late 2015. The USDA inventory suggest that the market supplies for December 2015 were up five percent, but should begin to taper off with the New Year.
First quarter supplies suggested by the USDA inventory would be up about one percent, but weights are expected to be down, so total first quarter pork production may be unchanged to up one percent if USDA inventory numbers are accurate. Using the USDA inventory numbers, second quarter pork production would be down one percent.
What about summer and fall pork production? Pork producers indicated to USDA that they would reduce farrowings this winter by two percent with farrowings unchanged in the summer.
R-CALF Requests Investigation into 2015 Cattle Price Collapse
In a formal request sent Tuesday to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary (Committee), R-CALF USA seeks an investigation into potential antitrust and anticompetitive conduct in the U.S. cattle and beef markets. The group is asking the Committee to investigate 13 specific issues including the cause for the dramatic, unprecedented collapse of U.S. cattle prices in 2015; whether there are structural problems in the U.S. cattle market that contributed to the price collapse in 2015; and whether dominant meatpackers or other major market participants engaged in unlawful conduct that adversely influenced the cattle futures market and cash cattle market in 2015.
In its highly detailed and well-documented request, the group provides evidence indicating that antitrust and anticompetitive conduct by dominant meatpackers and certain traders in the cattle futures market in 2015 caused a severe anomaly in U.S. cattle markets. That anomaly, according to the group, caused an "unprecedented extraction of equity from the U.S. live cattle industry" and harmed consumers as well.
As background for the Committee, the group explained that extremely tight cattle supplies and growing beef demand were among market fundamentals cited by analysts to support projections for strong cattle prices throughout 2015 and for up to three years beyond. During the first half of 2015, those projections were spot-on, the group stated.
"But then something went awry," The group wrote adding that in the latter part of 2015, "cattle prices collapsed farther and faster than during any time in history and the unprecedented volatility in the cattle futures market rendered it useless for price discovery purposes."
The group provided documentation showing that independent cattle feeders lost more than $500 per head of cattle sold during the collapse and, consequently, "the very foundation of the U.S. cattle industry's feeding sector - its independent cattle feeders - was irreparably damaged."
But as cash cattle prices plummeted and cattle futures prices fluctuated with extreme volatility, dominant meatpackers were benefiting from what one industry commentator referred to as 'gangbuster profits.' Meanwhile, consumers continued paying at or near record high prices for beef.
In further support of its request, R-CALF USA states that analysts are characterizing the 2015 price collapse with nondescript phrases such as 'market meltdown' and 'psychological upheaval,' indicating that they either do not know or they will not say what actually caused the catastrophic price collapse.
Winter is a Great Time for Photo Contest Pics
Submissions are still being accepted for the American Farm Bureau Federation and American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture's 2015 Farm Bureau Photo Contest (http://www.fb.org/programs/photocontest/) . The contest is open to all state and county Farm Bureau members and staff above 18 years of age at the time of entry, including professional photographers.
"The winter months offer many opportunities to get great pictures of farmers and ranchers working safely on the farm," said Kim Baker, AFBF's assistant director, creative services. "We want to showcase what life on the farm is really like, and these authentic photos will help tell agriculture's story."
Photo submissions will be used to accurately portray today's agriculture and the safe practices of farmers and ranchers. Additionally, submissions will also be used for future publications, promotions and social media by AFBF and related companies. All photos submitted must exemplify safe practices on the farm or ranch.
The contest is open for submissions until March 31, 2016. Photos may be entered in four categories: Farm Families, Farm Labor, Technology and Consumer Outreach. Monetary prizes will be awarded to the top three placing photos from each category. First place winners will be awarded $150, second place, $100 and third place, $75.
Contest winners will be announced April 15, 2016, on Farm Bureau's social media platforms and website.
For more information on how to register and to view the contest rules and regulations, visit the 2015 Farm Bureau Photo Contest webpage at http://www.fb.org/programs/photocontest/. Questions about the contest may be sent via email to photocontest@fb.org.
Vilsack Proclaims Today Bob Stallman Appreciation Day
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack released the following statement proclaiming today, Jan. 6, 2016, Bob Stallman Appreciation Day. Stallman is retiring as President of the American Farm Bureau Federation after 16 years of service.
"Bob Stallman is well-deserving of recognition for his outstanding contributions to all corners of agriculture and his commitment to strengthen rural America for the hard-working families who call it home. For 16 years, Bob has led the American Farm Bureau Federation with a steady hand and champion's heart. Under his leadership, the Farm Bureau's advocacy efforts to connect the work being done in rural America to its impact on the lives of every American have evolved and grown. Stallman and the Farm Bureau have played an instrumental role in shaping, passing and implementing the 2014 Farm Bill, supported producers in the wake of historic drought conditions and other natural disasters, and expanded new market opportunities for farmers and ranchers through their support of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and other trade agreements.
"Bob is the kind of leader who makes people in the business proud of what they do. He has inspired countless agricultural leaders, past and present, including myself. I am honored to call him a strong partner and a good friend.
"Bob leaves behind big shoes to fill, and USDA looks forward to working with the Farm Bureau as they select their next leader."
CHS Foundation now accepting scholarship applications
The CHS Foundation, the major giving entity of CHS Inc. (NASDAQ: CHSCP), North America's leading farmer owned cooperative, invites new and existing college students with agriculture or energy-related interests to apply for scholarships.
The CHS Foundation will award more than 300 scholarships in 2016. One hundred $1,000 scholarships will be made to high school students who choose to pursue agricultural-related degrees or STEM-related (science, technology, engineering, math) fields of study with an interest in agriculture or energy industry careers.
"CHS and the CHS Foundation are dedicated to developing future leaders," says William Nelson, president, CHS Foundation and vice president, CHS Corporate Citizenship. "We are proud to invest in educating young people to ensure they gain experience and build the skills necessary for long-lasting careers in the agriculture and energy industries."
High school scholarship applications must be submitted by April 1, 2016. An independent, external committee will select scholarship recipients based on essays, transcripts and reference letters. For additional eligibility information and to apply, visit http://www.chsinc.com/stewardship/scholarships.
More than 200 additional scholarships will help fund expenses for existing agriculture college students currently pursuing agriculture-related degrees at two- and four-year colleges. These scholarships are directly administered by more than 30 partnering universities throughout the U.S. and application deadlines vary by by school. For more information and a list of partnering universities, visit http://www.chsinc.com/stewardship/scholarships.
The CHS Foundation is the major giving entity of CHS Inc., the nation's leading farmer-owned cooperative and a global energy, grains and foods company. As a part of the CHS stewardship focus, the CHS Foundation supports education and leadership programs that invest in the future of agriculture, cooperative business and rural America.
MetaFarms launches Assurance assessment tracking Web-based software module
MetaFarms, Inc., announces the launch of Assurance — a new component of its popular Web-based platform designed specifically for livestock production audit and assessment tracking.
MetaFarms sees an increasing need and demand for a simpler way to enter and track various assessments, such as the Common Swine Industry Audit and PQA Plus, created by the National Pork Board. The Assurance tool will help the livestock industry meet goals and standards for safe food, animal well-being, environment, worker safety and increasing consumer awareness of food issues.
“As the emphasis on compliance and animal welfare continues to increase in the livestock industry, it’s important that our customers are prepared,” said Chad Becker, MetaFarms CEO. “Assurance provides innovative and easy-to-use assessment capabilities that will help bring visibility to highlight practices and improve deficiencies to build and protect your company and brand.”
According to Brian Parker, vice president of market development, “Assurance offers users a streamlined approach that increases efficiencies by eliminating redundant double entries, improving accuracy and giving users easy access to actionable information. As a part of the existing MetaFarms integrated platform, data and reporting through Assurance can be rolled up at an organizational level or narrowed down to an individual site, adding visibility and increased accountability to livestock operations.”
Assurance also allows users to enter assessment results on their mobile device and later sync that data. A high degree of customization gives flexibility to create, schedule and review assessments to fit a particular producer’s needs.
For more information, visit www.metafarms.com/assurance and come see us at the following January shows: SD Pork Congress, MN Pork Congress, IA Pork Congress.
The BioAg Alliance readies new microbial solution to improve corn harvests
The BioAg Alliance, Novozymes’ and Monsanto’s collaboration to improve crop harvests through naturally-occurring microbes, today announced results from its 2015 field trial program. Those results included a corn inoculant product, which increased yields by an average of 4 bushels per acre in U.S. field tests. The product is based on a fungus found in soil and researchers from the two companies have found a way to coat the microbes on corn seeds without harming the microbes’ performance or longevity. The Alliance plans to launch the new solution in the United States in 2017.
“The BioAg Alliance is focused on identifying ways that soil microbial solutions can deliver improved harvests from existing land,” said Brad Griffith, Vice President of Global Microbials for Monsanto. “This work is critically important to farmers as they work to meet demands and preserve their soil system. This breakthrough collaboration is unlocking new insights into soil microbial candidates to benefit farmers and our work with this corn seed inoculant is a great example of the results of our combined research.”
World’s largest microbe research program
Microbial-based solutions are derived from various microbes such as bacteria and fungi. The BioAg Alliance markets two types of microbial products: Inoculant products, which help plants with nutrient uptake, and biocontrol products, which help protect plants against pests and diseases. The products can be applied to seeds before planting, applied to growing crops or applied to soil in-furrow. The companies said that they can be used by farmers that grow broad acre crops such as corn and soy, and on fruits and vegetables. Microbial products can increase crop yields and can complement or replace agricultural chemicals and fertilizers.
The BioAg Alliance is currently running the world’s largest microbial research program to develop the next generation of these products. In 2015, the Alliance tested more than 2,000 microbial strains across 500,000 field trial plots in more than 50 locations in the United States. The companies said results from its U.S. field trial program showed its top new microbes increased corn yields by an average of 4-5 bushels per acre and soy yields by an average of 1.5 bushels per acre.
The BioAg Alliance expects to continue testing thousands of strains across a broad range of environments in extensive U.S. field trials in 2016.
“I believe we will witness a microbial revolution in agriculture”, said Thomas Schäfer, Vice President of BioAg research at Novozymes. “The world needs to produce more crops from our arable land while using fewer resources. The more we learn about microbes and their symbiotic relationships with plants, the more we realize how key they are to this challenge.”
Today, The BioAg Alliance’s products are used on around 65 million acres, but Monsanto and Novozymes envision that their products will be used on 250-500 million acres globally by 2025.
The agricultural market for microbials is estimated at $1.8 billion, while the market for traditional fertilizers and pesticides totals $240 billion.
The 2015 field trial results were announced as part of Monsanto’s annual pipeline update. For more information, go to www.monsanto.com/pipeline.
BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP® Products Earn Additional Label Claim for Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) Fetal Protection
Providing the highest level of protection against infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) and bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) viruses is critical, especially for pregnant cattle. Unprotected cows exposed to BVD Types 1 and 2 viruses may experience pregnancy loss or the delivery of weak or BVD persistently infected (PI) calves.1 To help producers further protect the cow herd, BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP® 5 and BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP 5 HB products, recently earned an additional label claim from the U.S. Department of Agriculture against fetal infection caused by (BVD) Types 1 and 2 viruses.
“With the value of calves in today’s market, helping protect every pregnancy has become even more important for cattle producers. The additional label claim against BVD fetal infection assures producers that our BOVI-SHIELD product can help protect the pregnancy through the critical stages of gestation, which is a benefit for cattle producers,” said Nathan Voris, DVM, MBA, Senior Marketing Manager, Cattle Vaccines with Zoetis. “Continued innovations in Zoetis reproductive vaccines help keep the cow herd healthier. Healthy pregnancies lead to healthy calves and ultimately, an improved bottom line for producers.”
Combined with the current label claims to prevent PI calves caused by BVD Types 1 and 2 viruses, and to aid in the prevention of abortion caused by IBR virus, the BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP® 5 and BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP 5 HB product lines have the highest level of fetal protection of any reproductive vaccine available to cow/calf producers.
“This level of fetal protection helps maximize the reproductive potential of your cows, helping to ensure a healthy productive calf every year,” Dr. Voris added. “I recommend producers work with their veterinarian to identify the right vaccine for the challenges on their operation. Selecting vaccines with the strongest label claims can help protect the herd from diseases that can harm the bottom line.”
Zoetis also offers a Fetal Protection Guarantee when BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP 5, BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP 5 HB, CATTLEMASTER GOLD FP® and PREGGUARD GOLD FP® 10 vaccines are used in herds according to label directions. It guarantees 100% of calves are born free from BVD persistent infection and the herd is protected against IBR abortion.
To learn more about the BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP 5 and BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP 5 HB product lines,* please contact your veterinarian, Zoetis representative, or simply visit www.CattleReproVaccines.com.
The Zoetis 100% BVD PI-Free Guarantee and the IBR Abortion Guarantee will be administered through Zoetis Veterinary Medical Information and Product Support (VMIPS) at 800-366-5288. Proof of purchase is required. Calves born to BVD PI-positive cows or heifers do not qualify for the guarantee. This guarantee does not apply to, and Zoetis shall not be liable for, any (x) damages caused as a result of the improper handling, misuse or abuse of the vaccines that are the subject of this guarantee, or the willful misconduct or negligence of any third party, or (y) any indirect, punitive, special, incidental or consequential damages. Zoetis reserves the right to modify or cancel the terms and conditions of this guarantee.
*Do not use in pregnant cattle (abortions can result) unless they were vaccinated, according to label directions, with any BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP or PREGGUARD GOLD FP vaccine prebreeding initially and within 12 months thereafter. Do not use in calves nursing pregnant cows unless their dams were vaccinated within the past 12 months as described above. To help ensure safety in pregnant cattle, heifers must receive at least 2 doses of any BOVI-SHIELD GOLD FP or PREGGUARD GOLD FP vaccine with the second dose administered approximately 30 days prebreeding.
Welcome to the KTIC Agriculture Information blog!!! Check back here for the latest in ag news and information, from local events to international happenings and government reports that affect your operation. Please email with suggestions! -Chad Moyer, Farm Director, KTIC Radio
Thursday, January 7, 2016
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
Tuesday January 5 Ag News
LENRD Seeks Public Comment on Groundwater Management Plan
The Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District (LENRD) voted in November to amend the Groundwater Management Plan to require flow meters on all irrigation wells across the 15-county district. The Board is now preparing for the next public hearing that will be held on Thursday, January 14th at 6:30 p.m. to receive public testimony on modifications to the LENRD Rules and Regulations for Management of Groundwater that are necessary for implementation of this new requirement.
At their December meeting, the board approved several additions to the flow meter list. The following meters are approved for installation across the district:
· McCrometer Propeller Flow Meters (All Models)
· McCrometer McMag 3000 Magmeter
· Senninger Flo-Wise Ag Rotor Sensor System
· Seametrics AG2000 Series Magmeter
· Growsmart by Lindsay IM3000 Magnetic Flow Meter
The board has not yet approved the deadline for when the meters need to be installed. They are considering a January 1, 2018 deadline. “The board will continue to work on the details of the rules and regulations and make further decisions after the public hearing on January 14th,” said LENRD General Manager Mike Sousek.
The public hearing will be held in the Lifelong Learning Center on the campus of Northeast Community College in Norfolk.
Livestock Mortality Composting Demonstration to be Held
Nebraska Extension is hosting a livestock mortality composting event for livestock producers and individuals and groups that support the livestock industry. This event will be held on Wednesday, January 20 from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm at the Christenson Research & Education Building at the UNL Agricultural Research & Development Center near Mead and Ithaca, NE.
This event will include speakers from Nebraska Extension and the USDA-NRCS discussing planning, construction, and management of a livestock mortality compost pile. The topics that will be covered and presenters are:
- “Mortality Compost as Part of a Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan” – Renee Hancock, NRCS Water Quality Specialist
- “Biosecurity Considerations When Composting Mortalities” – Dr. Kelly Heath, UNL Attending Veterinarian
- “Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Cost Share Opportunities” – Renee Hancock, NRCS
- “Composting Site Design, Construction and Operation” – Dr. Amy Schmidt, UNL Livestock Bioenvironmental Engineer
- “Compost Pile Management: Lessons Learned” – Henry Hilscher, ARDC Research Manager
Lunch will be provided by A-FAN (Alliance for the Future of Agriculture in Nebraska).
A visit to an on-site mortality composting pile will provide attendees an opportunity to view the compost process up close, see how the pile is managed, and learn how to establish a new pile during a demonstration process.
Those wishing to attend are asked to please RSVP by Jan 15th to: Amber Patterson, apatterson6@unl.edu, (402)472-1646 so the lunch plans can be made. For additional information on this event please contact: Dr. Amy Schmidt, Livestock Bioenvironmental Engineer, aschmidt@unl.edu, (402)472-0877 or Larry Howard, Nebraska Extension Educator, Cuming County, lhoward1@unl.edu, (402)372-6006.
2016 Nebraska Dairy Convention
The 2016 Nebraska Dairy Convention will be held on February 2, 2016 at the Ramada Inn in Columbus, NE.
The Nebraska Dairy Convention is open to all Nebraska dairy producers, families and guests — members and non- members. The 2016 NSDA Convention Sponsorship form, the 2016 Producer Membership form, and Convention Registration forms are available here for downloading... www.nebraskamilk.org.
They will again feature presentations aimed at helping dairy farmers be efficient and profitable farm managers, offer opportunities to visit with our allied sponsors in the Expo, and provide an setting for networking and visiting with your fellow dairy farmers. Plan to be in Columbus on February 2nd.
Nebraska Soybean Board Seeks Leaders to Represent Nebraska Soybean Farmers
This year, the Nebraska Soybean Board (NSB) will be seeking three soybean farmers to serve on the Board of Directors and to represent fellow soybean farmers and the industry.
How does the Election Work?
The election is conducted by mail-in ballot in July. Soybean farmers who reside in counties that are up for election in 2016 will receive ballots and candidate information regarding NSB’s election process via direct mail.
What are the 2016 Election Districts and Counties?
District 2: Counties of Burt, Cuming, Dakota, Dixon, Stanton, Thurston and Wayne.
District 4: Counties of Boone, Hamilton, Merrick, Nance, Platte, Polk and York.
District 8: Counties of Arthur, Banner, Blaine, Box Butte, Brown, Chase, Cherry, Cheyenne, Custer, Dawes, Dawson, Deuel, Dundy, Frontier, Furnas, Garden, Garfield, Gosper, Grant, Greeley, Harlan, Hayes, Hitchcock, Hooker, Howard, Keith, Keya Paha, Kimball, Lincoln, Logan, Loup, McPherson, Morrill, Perkins, Phelps, Red Willow, Rock, Scotts Bluff, Sheridan, Sherman, Sioux, Thomas, Valley and Wheeler.
Who Can Be a Candidate for the NSB seat on the Board?
· Be a resident of Nebraska
· Be a resident of the district in which the election is being held
· Be a soybean farmer in Nebraska for at least the previous 5 years
· Be 21 years of age or older
· Have submitted a NSB candidacy petition
Candidacy Must:
· Obtain a NSB Candidacy Petition by contacting NSB’s executive director, Victor Bohuslavsky, at 402-432-5720.
· Complete the petition and collect the signatures of 50 soybean farmers in their district
· Return such petition to the NSB office on or before April 15, 2016.
Roles and Responsibilities of Soybean Board Member Representative:
· Attend every NSB meeting – 8 day fiscal year commitment
· Attend/participate in other educational events sponsored by the Nebraska Soybean Checkoff
· Receive no salary but are reimbursed for expenses incurred while carrying out board business
· Serve a three-year term that would begin October 1, 2016
Areas of Focus for the Soybean Industry:
As an elected representative to NSB, you will help guide the Nebraska soybean industry in the areas of research, education, domestic and foreign markets, including new uses for soybeans and soybean products.
If you have questions regarding the election process, please contact NSB’s executive director, Victor Bohuslavsky, at 402-432-5720. For more information about the Nebraska soybean checkoff, visit www.nebraskasoybeans.org.
2016 Legislative Session Begins Jan. 6
(from NE Farm Bureau)
Nebraska’s 49 state senators are back in Lincoln for another round of lawmaking. Here are some things you should know as they begin the second session of the 104th Legislature.
- It begins Jan. 6 and is tentatively scheduled to end April 20.
- Public Hearings start on Jan. 19
- This is the short, 60-day session of the two-year cycle.
- There were 664 bills introduced last year and 243 were approved by the governor. Bills that weren’t killed or passed last session can be debated this year.
For more information about this year’s session go to Nebraskalegislature.gov.
Legislative Session Commences
Governor Pete Ricketts
Each New Year is a time to reflect on the last year and plan for next year. This is a special year at home for us, because my twins will enter their senior year of high school this fall. Between their work and school schedules, and my calendar, we cherish every moment we have together. Susanne and I hope the principles we have worked to impart to them–hard work, respect for others, and keeping your word–will serve them well as adults.
One of the reasons Nebraska is a great place to raise a family is because of the principles that Nebraskans share. We also value personal responsibility and common sense, and we don’t spend money we don’t have.
Our State Senators, who share these values and advocate for them, give of their time to represent their neighbors and serve taxpayers. This week, they will return to Lincoln for the second session of the 104th Legislature. During this session, senators will have the opportunity to deliver much-needed property tax relief, prioritize spending, and define strategies to grow Nebraska for future generations.
Our Unicameral Legislature has a proud history. Established in 1937, the Unicameral remains the only non-partisan, one-house legislative body in the United States. By law, we balance our budget, and we cannot borrow money to achieve this like the federal government. We work together to actually pass a budget each year—something that does not happen in many states. These traditions work to keep the State Capitol focused on fiscal responsibility.
This summer and fall, I held more than 20 town hall meetings across Nebraska, and people were clear and consistent on the need for property tax relief. State Senators tell me they hear the same thing in their districts. Last session we put $408 million into the property tax relief fund, a 45 percent increase over previous years. I believe property taxes are the number one issue we need to address this session, and I have been working with legislative leaders to make more progress on this for taxpayers.
There are many other priorities that will be considered in this short session. The $154 million reduction in the revenue forecast means we must work together to balance the budget and constrain the growth of government. With only 60 days to consider other issues like education funding, infrastructure, religious freedom, marijuana legalization, and another effort to expand Medicaid in Nebraska, this session will move quickly.
This session, however, is significant beyond the issues at hand. This is the last session for 11 term-limited senators who answered the noble calling of public service. Our appreciation goes out to Speaker Galen Hadley and Senators Dave Bloomfield, Kathy Campbell, Colby Coash, Tanya Cook, Mike Gloor, Ken Haar, Beau McCoy, Heath Mello, Ken Schilz, and Kate Sullivan. These senators have given of themselves to serve our great state and their constituents, and we are all grateful for their contribution to our democracy.
As the session opens, I ask that you contribute to democracy by engaging with those of us serving you. Please stay in touch with my office and with your senator’s office about how we can represent you best. You can find contact information for your senator by visiting www.NebraskaLegislature.gov, and you can reach my office by emailing pete.ricketts@nebraska.gov or calling 402-471-2244. I provide updates about important bills on my website, so please be sure to watch www.Governor.Nebraska.gov in the coming weeks and months.
ISU Winter Classes Scheduled for Women in Agriculture
Farm women have important management roles in Iowa agriculture, with responsibilities ranging from agriculture business management and grain marketing to farm transition planning. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach provides research-based educational programs for Iowa women farmers through the Women in Agriculture program. Registration is now open for classes in nine Iowa counties at http://www.aep.iastate.edu/womeninag/.
“Farm women are directly impacting Iowa’s economy to the tune of nearly 500 million dollars a year,” said Madeline Schultz, ISU Extension and Outreach Women in Agriculture program manager. “Women value educational programs that help them juggle farming and non-farming careers, work with family/partners and operate profitable businesses.”
Three courses are currently open for registration: Annie’s Project: Farm Business Management, Women Marketing Grain, and Managing for Today and Tomorrow: Farm Transition Planning.
Farm business management course
Annie’s Project: Farm Business Management is a six-session farm management course for women. Topics include financial, human resources, legal, marketing and production. It is the agricultural business education program that empowers farm and ranch women who want to be even more knowledgeable about their agricultural businesses.
Jan. 16 – Sac City. Sac County Extension Office, 620 Park Ave
Jan. 25 – Creston. Southwest Community College, 1501 W Townline St
Jan. 26 – Onawa. Monona County Extension Office, 119 Iowa Ave
Feb. 4 – Humboldt. Humboldt County Extension Office, 727 Sumner Ave
Feb. 8 – West Des Moines. Des Moines Area Community College, 5959 Grand Ave
March 17 – Waukon. Location to be announced
Grain marketing course
Women Marketing Grain encourages development of crop marketing plans with price, time and financial goals in mind. The goal of this four-session course is to improve participants’ price risk management skills by enhancing their knowledge of marketing principles and risk management tools. Topics include contracts, online decision-making tools, crop insurance and price movements.
Feb. 8 – Marshalltown. Iowa Valley Continuing Education, 3702 S Center St
Farm transitioning course
Managing for Today and Tomorrow: Farm Transition Planning guides women and their families in making good generational transition decisions. This is a five-session course. Topics include business, estate, retirement and succession planning.
Feb. 1 – Gilbert. Gilbert High School, 312 Gretten St
March 10 – Tipton. Cedar County Extension Office, 107 Cedar St
Registration for all courses is available online at http://www.aep.iastate.edu/womeninag/. Course fee is $75, which includes a light meal, course materials and professional development. Advance registration is required.
For more information about women in agriculture courses available from ISU Extension and Outreach contact Madeline Schultz at schultz@iastate.edu or 515-294-0588.
Tally Time – Use herd records to drive decisions
Sandy Johnson, Kansas State University Extension Livestock Specialist
Few people really “enjoy” keeping records but having the records when you need them can be a great help. Cow/calf operations require considerable capital investment and must manage in the face of rising prices, regulatory uncertainty and price volatility. A good set of records can inform decisions and be a great asset in troubleshooting. In the case of disasters they can provide the ready documentation needed for assistance programs.
Legislation aimed at reducing the development of antibiotic resistance will now require producers to retain copies of veterinary feed directives for a period of two years. The silver lining to any required records could be getting producers to collect and analyze more data about their operation than they have in the past.
The “RedBook” was created to help producers have a place to record, on the go, all the day to day happenings that can be useful for management decisions in a cow/calf operation. The calf information and calendar pages take up the bulk of the Redbook but there are a number of other pages that are extremely useful. Often times we might use a few features of such a tool and overlook all the other useful pieces. Whether in this format or another, producers should strive to collect and use all the data represented by these forms.
Which of the following do you collect?
•Cowherd inventory, beginning of fiscal year, start of breeding season
• Bull inventory and breeding soundness exams
• Pasture usage
• SPA Performance Measures
• Body Condition Score Record – weaning, pre-calving, calving, breeding
• Calving Activity – tracks calving distribution for various age or management groups
• Calf health record
• Weaning data
• Cow Health record
• Treatment record
• Cattle movement worksheet
• Cattle Sales
• Death losses
• Supplement Record
• Precipitation Record
The health/vaccination record sheet includes detailed information about the specific product, serial number, lot number, expiration date, withdrawal date, site of administration. All key information to have if there was some reaction to a vaccine or if needed as part of documenting the vaccination history of a group of animals to aid marketing.
The treatment record includes similar information as the vaccination record and helps ensure that appropriate withdrawal times have passed before an animal is sold. We all want a high quality, safe food supply for our families and other consumers. This type of documentation, if shared with consumers, could build consumer confidence in our product.
The Redbook is also available as an Excel file with all the same record sheets. The Excel version could serve as a backup to the paper copy since Redbooks have been known to meet with tragic fates in washing machines and mud puddles.
Those that are more tech savvy may want to set up some of their own record sheets using features such as Google docs. In an area with good smartphone coverage, one producer uses this method for a number of items including tracking hay inventory as it is fed, animal treatments records and group procedures.
There is no one right way, however, relying strictly on memory is subject to sudden and unexpected failure. The process of recording information can actually be beneficial and draw attention toward the ways that information can help the operation. Outside demands may be the only reason some producers keep any records, but increasingly many businesses are finding power in data to drive decisions. Look for opportunities to inform your decisions with data.
You can find the spreadsheet version or order Redbooks directly at this site http://www.beefusa.org/redbook.aspx.
See for Yourself the Soybean Checkoff’s Role in the Global Soy Industry
Meet domestic and international customers, see where soybeans go beyond the elevator and evaluate the work of the soy checkoff. That’s what farmers will experience during the United Soybean Board’s See for Yourself program.
See for Yourself offers 10 soybean farmers from around the country the opportunity to see and evaluate the work of the checkoff firsthand. From the use of U.S. soy by domestic companies to the export of U.S. soy to customers around the world, See for Yourself shows program participants the checkoff’s role in maximizing U.S. soybean farmer profitability.
“The See for Yourself program showed me that the soy industry is so much more than what we do on each of our farms – it’s a global industry,” says Nathan Brown, a Hillsboro, Ohio, soybean farmer and 2015 See for Yourself program participant. “The program also allowed me to see how USB invests our checkoff dollars.”
Accompanied by checkoff farmer-leaders, participants will meet a diverse set of customers, both domestic and international, and see a variety of sites that represent end uses for U.S. soy, such as animal agriculture, the food industry, industrial users and more. Along the way, USB farmer-leaders will share greater insight into the process and rationale behind checkoff investments.
“The See for Yourself program is a once-in-a-lifetime experience,” says Keith Tapp, chair of the USB Audit and Evaluation Committee, which sponsors See for Yourself. “Participants get the opportunity to see the checkoff up close and the work it does to improve the bottom line for U.S. soybean farmers across the country.”
All U.S. soybean farmers over the age of 18 can apply through April 1 by visiting the USB website, www.UnitedSoybean.org/SeeforYourself. The program is tentatively scheduled for August 8-12, 2016.
USDA Updates Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease Order
The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service issued an updated Federal Order related to swine enteric coronavirus diseases. The updated Order will do several things, including changing how emergency funding APHIS received in 2014 will be used. APHIS has reprioritized its needs going forward and will focus all remaining SECD funds towards diagnostic testing. With this modification, the funds should last long enough to cover diagnostic testing through this winter season.
The revised Federal Order will also eliminate the herd plan requirement, as well as reimbursement to veterinarians for completing those plans. And, it will also eliminate reimbursement for biosecurity actions, like truck washing.
In response to a large number of SECD cases that were causing significant hardship for the U.S. swine industry, APHIS issued a Federal Order in June 2014 making SECD a reportable disease. At the same time, USDA made funds available to cover specific costs associated with the disease. SECD remains a reportable disease, which means that producers, veterinarians, and diagnostic laboratories are required to report all cases of SECD to USDA or State animal health officials. The reporting criteria are unchanged in the updated Federal Order.
Today, USDA is receiving more accurate and timely information about SECD affected herds and their locations, which allows animal health officials to better understand how the disease spreads and what measures are most effective in containing it. The outbreak peaked between January and March 2015. In the last 5 months, the weekly average of new confirmed positive premises has dropped 90% when compared to the average number of weekly cases during the peak of the outbreak.
Fertilizer Prices Plunge in Last Week of 2015
Retail fertilizer prices rounded out 2015 with large declines the final week of December, according to fertilizer retailers tracked by DTN. This marks the first time in many months average prices of multiple fertilizers moved significantly.
All eight of the major fertilizers drifted lower compared to a month earlier, and six of the eight were down by some consequence.
Leading the way lower was DAP, which slid 9% compared to last month. The phosphorus fertilizer had an average price of $494 per ton. DAP fell below the $500-per-ton level for the first time since the second week of January 2014 when the price was $495 per ton.
Both potash and anhydrous were down 6% compared to last month. Potash had an average price of $398/ton and anhydrous at $590/ton.
The current price of $398/ton for potash continues to be the lowest prices on our DTN retail fertilizer dataset. Meanwhile, the $590/ton price for anhydrous is the first time the nitrogen fertilizer had been under $600/ton since the third week of August 2010 when the average price was $593/ton.
MAP, UAN28 and UAN32 were all down 5% from a month earlier. MAP had an average price of $531/ton, UAN28 $273/ton and UAN32 $317/ton.
The remaining two fertilizers, urea and 10-34-0, had slight declines compared to last month. Urea had an average price of $383/ton and 10-34-0 was at $570/ton.
On a price per pound of nitrogen basis, the average urea price was at $0.42/lb.N, anhydrous $0.36/lb.N, UAN28 $0.49/lb.N and UAN32 $0.50/lb.N.
All fertilizers are lower compared to a year earlier. All but one fertilizer is now double digits lower. The only fertilizer not down much is 10-34-0, which fell 1%.
UAN32 is 10% less expensive, MAP is 11% lower, DAP is 13% less expensive and UAN28 is 15% lower from a year ago. Both anhydrous and urea are 17% lower and potash is now 18% less expensive compared to a year earlier.
USDA to Measure Economic Well-Being of Farms
The USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service will spend the next several months contacting farmers and ranchers across the nation to conduct the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. The results of this survey will serve as a baseline for numerous federal policies and programs that affect U.S. farms and farm families.
NASS conducts ARMS jointly with USDA's Economic Research Service. In an effort to obtain the most accurate data, the federal agencies will reach out to nearly 41,000 producers across the country through April 4. The survey asks the producers to provide data on their operating expenditures, production costs and household characteristics.
As with all NASS surveys, information provided by respondents is confidential by law.
The economic data gathered in ARMS will be published in the annual Farm Production Expenditures report later this summer.
Brazilian Corn Exports Smash Record in December
Brazil registered record corn exports in December, further highlighting its competitiveness in international markets.
Shipments hit 6.3 million metric tons in December, up 84% on the year before, according to Brazilian Development, Trade and Industry Ministry.
As a result, shipments in 2015 reached 28.9 mmt, some 40% higher than 2014 and easily topping the previous record of 26 mmt shipped in 2013.
Brazil harvested a bumper crop of 86 mmt in 2014-15. Meanwhile, a 32% devaluation of the real in 2015 allowed the No. 2 exporter to be aggressive in placing its corn.
API’s "State of American Energy" Speech Embraces Status Quo and Seeks to Deny Consumer Choice
Following the American Petroleum Industry’s (API) annual “State of American Energy” speech, Tom Buis, co-chair of Growth Energy, issued the following statement:
“API’s ‘State of American Energy’ speech, brought to you by Big Oil, is nothing new. While oil companies talk about the future of energy in this country, they seem fixated on a finite resource and fail to acknowledge that renewable fuels play a critical role in meeting the nation’s growing energy needs.
“Year after year, API attempts to drive the narrative that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) must be reformed or repealed. This argument is fundamentally flawed. The claims that renewable fuels will increase the cost of energy or that they are worse for the environment are simply ridiculous. Countless independent studies have shown that renewable fuels like ethanol help drive down the cost of fuel. Furthermore, when it comes environmental damage, no one has a worse record than oil companies. Their record of ecological disasters is extensive and deeply troubling. Between 2008 and 2014, more than 25,000 oil spills accounted for more than 217 million gallons of oil and petroleum based products being discharged into U.S. navigable waterways, territorial waters, tributaries, the contiguous zone, onto shoreline, or into other waters and land that threaten the environment. That’s an average of more than 30 million gallons spilled a year. In contrast, ethanol is biodegradable and no beaches have ever been closed due to an ethanol spill.
“They claim the RFS is a ‘relic’ that is no longer useful, but the fact is that the RFS has been a resounding success, doing exactly what it was intended to do when a bipartisan Congress passed it over a decade ago.
“The RFS is the most successful energy policy this nation has enacted in the last 40 years. Not only is it creating jobs, it is revitalizing rural economies, reducing harmful emissions, improving our environment and reducing our dangerous dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuel. Additionally, it is providing consumers with a choice at the pump.
“API notes the importance of consumers in their speech, yet seems to believe the American consumer is best served by denying them a choice. Furthermore, they attempt to distort the truth saying there is no demand for renewable fuels. Yet major retail chains like Sheetz, Kum & Go, MAPCO and others are adopting higher blends and offering them to consumers and seeing tremendous success and growing demand.
“The bottom line is that API wants to kill any competition that may threaten their bottom line and record profits. They will stop at nothing to end the Renewable Fuel Standard, blocking the wide spread adoption of renewable fuels that consumers demand by maintaining the so-called “blend wall” to prevent market access for higher blends of biofuels such as E15 to ensure that their lock on the fuels market goes unchecked.
“The RFS is a win-win for America, as it is an essential part of a true ‘all of the above’ energy strategy needed to meet the growing energy demands of the 21st century.”
The Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District (LENRD) voted in November to amend the Groundwater Management Plan to require flow meters on all irrigation wells across the 15-county district. The Board is now preparing for the next public hearing that will be held on Thursday, January 14th at 6:30 p.m. to receive public testimony on modifications to the LENRD Rules and Regulations for Management of Groundwater that are necessary for implementation of this new requirement.
At their December meeting, the board approved several additions to the flow meter list. The following meters are approved for installation across the district:
· McCrometer Propeller Flow Meters (All Models)
· McCrometer McMag 3000 Magmeter
· Senninger Flo-Wise Ag Rotor Sensor System
· Seametrics AG2000 Series Magmeter
· Growsmart by Lindsay IM3000 Magnetic Flow Meter
The board has not yet approved the deadline for when the meters need to be installed. They are considering a January 1, 2018 deadline. “The board will continue to work on the details of the rules and regulations and make further decisions after the public hearing on January 14th,” said LENRD General Manager Mike Sousek.
The public hearing will be held in the Lifelong Learning Center on the campus of Northeast Community College in Norfolk.
Livestock Mortality Composting Demonstration to be Held
Nebraska Extension is hosting a livestock mortality composting event for livestock producers and individuals and groups that support the livestock industry. This event will be held on Wednesday, January 20 from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm at the Christenson Research & Education Building at the UNL Agricultural Research & Development Center near Mead and Ithaca, NE.
This event will include speakers from Nebraska Extension and the USDA-NRCS discussing planning, construction, and management of a livestock mortality compost pile. The topics that will be covered and presenters are:
- “Mortality Compost as Part of a Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan” – Renee Hancock, NRCS Water Quality Specialist
- “Biosecurity Considerations When Composting Mortalities” – Dr. Kelly Heath, UNL Attending Veterinarian
- “Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Cost Share Opportunities” – Renee Hancock, NRCS
- “Composting Site Design, Construction and Operation” – Dr. Amy Schmidt, UNL Livestock Bioenvironmental Engineer
- “Compost Pile Management: Lessons Learned” – Henry Hilscher, ARDC Research Manager
Lunch will be provided by A-FAN (Alliance for the Future of Agriculture in Nebraska).
A visit to an on-site mortality composting pile will provide attendees an opportunity to view the compost process up close, see how the pile is managed, and learn how to establish a new pile during a demonstration process.
Those wishing to attend are asked to please RSVP by Jan 15th to: Amber Patterson, apatterson6@unl.edu, (402)472-1646 so the lunch plans can be made. For additional information on this event please contact: Dr. Amy Schmidt, Livestock Bioenvironmental Engineer, aschmidt@unl.edu, (402)472-0877 or Larry Howard, Nebraska Extension Educator, Cuming County, lhoward1@unl.edu, (402)372-6006.
2016 Nebraska Dairy Convention
The 2016 Nebraska Dairy Convention will be held on February 2, 2016 at the Ramada Inn in Columbus, NE.
The Nebraska Dairy Convention is open to all Nebraska dairy producers, families and guests — members and non- members. The 2016 NSDA Convention Sponsorship form, the 2016 Producer Membership form, and Convention Registration forms are available here for downloading... www.nebraskamilk.org.
They will again feature presentations aimed at helping dairy farmers be efficient and profitable farm managers, offer opportunities to visit with our allied sponsors in the Expo, and provide an setting for networking and visiting with your fellow dairy farmers. Plan to be in Columbus on February 2nd.
Nebraska Soybean Board Seeks Leaders to Represent Nebraska Soybean Farmers
This year, the Nebraska Soybean Board (NSB) will be seeking three soybean farmers to serve on the Board of Directors and to represent fellow soybean farmers and the industry.
How does the Election Work?
The election is conducted by mail-in ballot in July. Soybean farmers who reside in counties that are up for election in 2016 will receive ballots and candidate information regarding NSB’s election process via direct mail.
What are the 2016 Election Districts and Counties?
District 2: Counties of Burt, Cuming, Dakota, Dixon, Stanton, Thurston and Wayne.
District 4: Counties of Boone, Hamilton, Merrick, Nance, Platte, Polk and York.
District 8: Counties of Arthur, Banner, Blaine, Box Butte, Brown, Chase, Cherry, Cheyenne, Custer, Dawes, Dawson, Deuel, Dundy, Frontier, Furnas, Garden, Garfield, Gosper, Grant, Greeley, Harlan, Hayes, Hitchcock, Hooker, Howard, Keith, Keya Paha, Kimball, Lincoln, Logan, Loup, McPherson, Morrill, Perkins, Phelps, Red Willow, Rock, Scotts Bluff, Sheridan, Sherman, Sioux, Thomas, Valley and Wheeler.
Who Can Be a Candidate for the NSB seat on the Board?
· Be a resident of Nebraska
· Be a resident of the district in which the election is being held
· Be a soybean farmer in Nebraska for at least the previous 5 years
· Be 21 years of age or older
· Have submitted a NSB candidacy petition
Candidacy Must:
· Obtain a NSB Candidacy Petition by contacting NSB’s executive director, Victor Bohuslavsky, at 402-432-5720.
· Complete the petition and collect the signatures of 50 soybean farmers in their district
· Return such petition to the NSB office on or before April 15, 2016.
Roles and Responsibilities of Soybean Board Member Representative:
· Attend every NSB meeting – 8 day fiscal year commitment
· Attend/participate in other educational events sponsored by the Nebraska Soybean Checkoff
· Receive no salary but are reimbursed for expenses incurred while carrying out board business
· Serve a three-year term that would begin October 1, 2016
Areas of Focus for the Soybean Industry:
As an elected representative to NSB, you will help guide the Nebraska soybean industry in the areas of research, education, domestic and foreign markets, including new uses for soybeans and soybean products.
If you have questions regarding the election process, please contact NSB’s executive director, Victor Bohuslavsky, at 402-432-5720. For more information about the Nebraska soybean checkoff, visit www.nebraskasoybeans.org.
2016 Legislative Session Begins Jan. 6
(from NE Farm Bureau)
Nebraska’s 49 state senators are back in Lincoln for another round of lawmaking. Here are some things you should know as they begin the second session of the 104th Legislature.
- It begins Jan. 6 and is tentatively scheduled to end April 20.
- Public Hearings start on Jan. 19
- This is the short, 60-day session of the two-year cycle.
- There were 664 bills introduced last year and 243 were approved by the governor. Bills that weren’t killed or passed last session can be debated this year.
For more information about this year’s session go to Nebraskalegislature.gov.
Legislative Session Commences
Governor Pete Ricketts
Each New Year is a time to reflect on the last year and plan for next year. This is a special year at home for us, because my twins will enter their senior year of high school this fall. Between their work and school schedules, and my calendar, we cherish every moment we have together. Susanne and I hope the principles we have worked to impart to them–hard work, respect for others, and keeping your word–will serve them well as adults.
One of the reasons Nebraska is a great place to raise a family is because of the principles that Nebraskans share. We also value personal responsibility and common sense, and we don’t spend money we don’t have.
Our State Senators, who share these values and advocate for them, give of their time to represent their neighbors and serve taxpayers. This week, they will return to Lincoln for the second session of the 104th Legislature. During this session, senators will have the opportunity to deliver much-needed property tax relief, prioritize spending, and define strategies to grow Nebraska for future generations.
Our Unicameral Legislature has a proud history. Established in 1937, the Unicameral remains the only non-partisan, one-house legislative body in the United States. By law, we balance our budget, and we cannot borrow money to achieve this like the federal government. We work together to actually pass a budget each year—something that does not happen in many states. These traditions work to keep the State Capitol focused on fiscal responsibility.
This summer and fall, I held more than 20 town hall meetings across Nebraska, and people were clear and consistent on the need for property tax relief. State Senators tell me they hear the same thing in their districts. Last session we put $408 million into the property tax relief fund, a 45 percent increase over previous years. I believe property taxes are the number one issue we need to address this session, and I have been working with legislative leaders to make more progress on this for taxpayers.
There are many other priorities that will be considered in this short session. The $154 million reduction in the revenue forecast means we must work together to balance the budget and constrain the growth of government. With only 60 days to consider other issues like education funding, infrastructure, religious freedom, marijuana legalization, and another effort to expand Medicaid in Nebraska, this session will move quickly.
This session, however, is significant beyond the issues at hand. This is the last session for 11 term-limited senators who answered the noble calling of public service. Our appreciation goes out to Speaker Galen Hadley and Senators Dave Bloomfield, Kathy Campbell, Colby Coash, Tanya Cook, Mike Gloor, Ken Haar, Beau McCoy, Heath Mello, Ken Schilz, and Kate Sullivan. These senators have given of themselves to serve our great state and their constituents, and we are all grateful for their contribution to our democracy.
As the session opens, I ask that you contribute to democracy by engaging with those of us serving you. Please stay in touch with my office and with your senator’s office about how we can represent you best. You can find contact information for your senator by visiting www.NebraskaLegislature.gov, and you can reach my office by emailing pete.ricketts@nebraska.gov or calling 402-471-2244. I provide updates about important bills on my website, so please be sure to watch www.Governor.Nebraska.gov in the coming weeks and months.
ISU Winter Classes Scheduled for Women in Agriculture
Farm women have important management roles in Iowa agriculture, with responsibilities ranging from agriculture business management and grain marketing to farm transition planning. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach provides research-based educational programs for Iowa women farmers through the Women in Agriculture program. Registration is now open for classes in nine Iowa counties at http://www.aep.iastate.edu/womeninag/.
“Farm women are directly impacting Iowa’s economy to the tune of nearly 500 million dollars a year,” said Madeline Schultz, ISU Extension and Outreach Women in Agriculture program manager. “Women value educational programs that help them juggle farming and non-farming careers, work with family/partners and operate profitable businesses.”
Three courses are currently open for registration: Annie’s Project: Farm Business Management, Women Marketing Grain, and Managing for Today and Tomorrow: Farm Transition Planning.
Farm business management course
Annie’s Project: Farm Business Management is a six-session farm management course for women. Topics include financial, human resources, legal, marketing and production. It is the agricultural business education program that empowers farm and ranch women who want to be even more knowledgeable about their agricultural businesses.
Jan. 16 – Sac City. Sac County Extension Office, 620 Park Ave
Jan. 25 – Creston. Southwest Community College, 1501 W Townline St
Jan. 26 – Onawa. Monona County Extension Office, 119 Iowa Ave
Feb. 4 – Humboldt. Humboldt County Extension Office, 727 Sumner Ave
Feb. 8 – West Des Moines. Des Moines Area Community College, 5959 Grand Ave
March 17 – Waukon. Location to be announced
Grain marketing course
Women Marketing Grain encourages development of crop marketing plans with price, time and financial goals in mind. The goal of this four-session course is to improve participants’ price risk management skills by enhancing their knowledge of marketing principles and risk management tools. Topics include contracts, online decision-making tools, crop insurance and price movements.
Feb. 8 – Marshalltown. Iowa Valley Continuing Education, 3702 S Center St
Farm transitioning course
Managing for Today and Tomorrow: Farm Transition Planning guides women and their families in making good generational transition decisions. This is a five-session course. Topics include business, estate, retirement and succession planning.
Feb. 1 – Gilbert. Gilbert High School, 312 Gretten St
March 10 – Tipton. Cedar County Extension Office, 107 Cedar St
Registration for all courses is available online at http://www.aep.iastate.edu/womeninag/. Course fee is $75, which includes a light meal, course materials and professional development. Advance registration is required.
For more information about women in agriculture courses available from ISU Extension and Outreach contact Madeline Schultz at schultz@iastate.edu or 515-294-0588.
Tally Time – Use herd records to drive decisions
Sandy Johnson, Kansas State University Extension Livestock Specialist
Few people really “enjoy” keeping records but having the records when you need them can be a great help. Cow/calf operations require considerable capital investment and must manage in the face of rising prices, regulatory uncertainty and price volatility. A good set of records can inform decisions and be a great asset in troubleshooting. In the case of disasters they can provide the ready documentation needed for assistance programs.
Legislation aimed at reducing the development of antibiotic resistance will now require producers to retain copies of veterinary feed directives for a period of two years. The silver lining to any required records could be getting producers to collect and analyze more data about their operation than they have in the past.
The “RedBook” was created to help producers have a place to record, on the go, all the day to day happenings that can be useful for management decisions in a cow/calf operation. The calf information and calendar pages take up the bulk of the Redbook but there are a number of other pages that are extremely useful. Often times we might use a few features of such a tool and overlook all the other useful pieces. Whether in this format or another, producers should strive to collect and use all the data represented by these forms.
Which of the following do you collect?
•Cowherd inventory, beginning of fiscal year, start of breeding season
• Bull inventory and breeding soundness exams
• Pasture usage
• SPA Performance Measures
• Body Condition Score Record – weaning, pre-calving, calving, breeding
• Calving Activity – tracks calving distribution for various age or management groups
• Calf health record
• Weaning data
• Cow Health record
• Treatment record
• Cattle movement worksheet
• Cattle Sales
• Death losses
• Supplement Record
• Precipitation Record
The health/vaccination record sheet includes detailed information about the specific product, serial number, lot number, expiration date, withdrawal date, site of administration. All key information to have if there was some reaction to a vaccine or if needed as part of documenting the vaccination history of a group of animals to aid marketing.
The treatment record includes similar information as the vaccination record and helps ensure that appropriate withdrawal times have passed before an animal is sold. We all want a high quality, safe food supply for our families and other consumers. This type of documentation, if shared with consumers, could build consumer confidence in our product.
The Redbook is also available as an Excel file with all the same record sheets. The Excel version could serve as a backup to the paper copy since Redbooks have been known to meet with tragic fates in washing machines and mud puddles.
Those that are more tech savvy may want to set up some of their own record sheets using features such as Google docs. In an area with good smartphone coverage, one producer uses this method for a number of items including tracking hay inventory as it is fed, animal treatments records and group procedures.
There is no one right way, however, relying strictly on memory is subject to sudden and unexpected failure. The process of recording information can actually be beneficial and draw attention toward the ways that information can help the operation. Outside demands may be the only reason some producers keep any records, but increasingly many businesses are finding power in data to drive decisions. Look for opportunities to inform your decisions with data.
You can find the spreadsheet version or order Redbooks directly at this site http://www.beefusa.org/redbook.aspx.
See for Yourself the Soybean Checkoff’s Role in the Global Soy Industry
Meet domestic and international customers, see where soybeans go beyond the elevator and evaluate the work of the soy checkoff. That’s what farmers will experience during the United Soybean Board’s See for Yourself program.
See for Yourself offers 10 soybean farmers from around the country the opportunity to see and evaluate the work of the checkoff firsthand. From the use of U.S. soy by domestic companies to the export of U.S. soy to customers around the world, See for Yourself shows program participants the checkoff’s role in maximizing U.S. soybean farmer profitability.
“The See for Yourself program showed me that the soy industry is so much more than what we do on each of our farms – it’s a global industry,” says Nathan Brown, a Hillsboro, Ohio, soybean farmer and 2015 See for Yourself program participant. “The program also allowed me to see how USB invests our checkoff dollars.”
Accompanied by checkoff farmer-leaders, participants will meet a diverse set of customers, both domestic and international, and see a variety of sites that represent end uses for U.S. soy, such as animal agriculture, the food industry, industrial users and more. Along the way, USB farmer-leaders will share greater insight into the process and rationale behind checkoff investments.
“The See for Yourself program is a once-in-a-lifetime experience,” says Keith Tapp, chair of the USB Audit and Evaluation Committee, which sponsors See for Yourself. “Participants get the opportunity to see the checkoff up close and the work it does to improve the bottom line for U.S. soybean farmers across the country.”
All U.S. soybean farmers over the age of 18 can apply through April 1 by visiting the USB website, www.UnitedSoybean.org/SeeforYourself. The program is tentatively scheduled for August 8-12, 2016.
USDA Updates Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease Order
The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service issued an updated Federal Order related to swine enteric coronavirus diseases. The updated Order will do several things, including changing how emergency funding APHIS received in 2014 will be used. APHIS has reprioritized its needs going forward and will focus all remaining SECD funds towards diagnostic testing. With this modification, the funds should last long enough to cover diagnostic testing through this winter season.
The revised Federal Order will also eliminate the herd plan requirement, as well as reimbursement to veterinarians for completing those plans. And, it will also eliminate reimbursement for biosecurity actions, like truck washing.
In response to a large number of SECD cases that were causing significant hardship for the U.S. swine industry, APHIS issued a Federal Order in June 2014 making SECD a reportable disease. At the same time, USDA made funds available to cover specific costs associated with the disease. SECD remains a reportable disease, which means that producers, veterinarians, and diagnostic laboratories are required to report all cases of SECD to USDA or State animal health officials. The reporting criteria are unchanged in the updated Federal Order.
Today, USDA is receiving more accurate and timely information about SECD affected herds and their locations, which allows animal health officials to better understand how the disease spreads and what measures are most effective in containing it. The outbreak peaked between January and March 2015. In the last 5 months, the weekly average of new confirmed positive premises has dropped 90% when compared to the average number of weekly cases during the peak of the outbreak.
Fertilizer Prices Plunge in Last Week of 2015
Retail fertilizer prices rounded out 2015 with large declines the final week of December, according to fertilizer retailers tracked by DTN. This marks the first time in many months average prices of multiple fertilizers moved significantly.
All eight of the major fertilizers drifted lower compared to a month earlier, and six of the eight were down by some consequence.
Leading the way lower was DAP, which slid 9% compared to last month. The phosphorus fertilizer had an average price of $494 per ton. DAP fell below the $500-per-ton level for the first time since the second week of January 2014 when the price was $495 per ton.
Both potash and anhydrous were down 6% compared to last month. Potash had an average price of $398/ton and anhydrous at $590/ton.
The current price of $398/ton for potash continues to be the lowest prices on our DTN retail fertilizer dataset. Meanwhile, the $590/ton price for anhydrous is the first time the nitrogen fertilizer had been under $600/ton since the third week of August 2010 when the average price was $593/ton.
MAP, UAN28 and UAN32 were all down 5% from a month earlier. MAP had an average price of $531/ton, UAN28 $273/ton and UAN32 $317/ton.
The remaining two fertilizers, urea and 10-34-0, had slight declines compared to last month. Urea had an average price of $383/ton and 10-34-0 was at $570/ton.
On a price per pound of nitrogen basis, the average urea price was at $0.42/lb.N, anhydrous $0.36/lb.N, UAN28 $0.49/lb.N and UAN32 $0.50/lb.N.
All fertilizers are lower compared to a year earlier. All but one fertilizer is now double digits lower. The only fertilizer not down much is 10-34-0, which fell 1%.
UAN32 is 10% less expensive, MAP is 11% lower, DAP is 13% less expensive and UAN28 is 15% lower from a year ago. Both anhydrous and urea are 17% lower and potash is now 18% less expensive compared to a year earlier.
USDA to Measure Economic Well-Being of Farms
The USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service will spend the next several months contacting farmers and ranchers across the nation to conduct the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. The results of this survey will serve as a baseline for numerous federal policies and programs that affect U.S. farms and farm families.
NASS conducts ARMS jointly with USDA's Economic Research Service. In an effort to obtain the most accurate data, the federal agencies will reach out to nearly 41,000 producers across the country through April 4. The survey asks the producers to provide data on their operating expenditures, production costs and household characteristics.
As with all NASS surveys, information provided by respondents is confidential by law.
The economic data gathered in ARMS will be published in the annual Farm Production Expenditures report later this summer.
Brazilian Corn Exports Smash Record in December
Brazil registered record corn exports in December, further highlighting its competitiveness in international markets.
Shipments hit 6.3 million metric tons in December, up 84% on the year before, according to Brazilian Development, Trade and Industry Ministry.
As a result, shipments in 2015 reached 28.9 mmt, some 40% higher than 2014 and easily topping the previous record of 26 mmt shipped in 2013.
Brazil harvested a bumper crop of 86 mmt in 2014-15. Meanwhile, a 32% devaluation of the real in 2015 allowed the No. 2 exporter to be aggressive in placing its corn.
API’s "State of American Energy" Speech Embraces Status Quo and Seeks to Deny Consumer Choice
Following the American Petroleum Industry’s (API) annual “State of American Energy” speech, Tom Buis, co-chair of Growth Energy, issued the following statement:
“API’s ‘State of American Energy’ speech, brought to you by Big Oil, is nothing new. While oil companies talk about the future of energy in this country, they seem fixated on a finite resource and fail to acknowledge that renewable fuels play a critical role in meeting the nation’s growing energy needs.
“Year after year, API attempts to drive the narrative that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) must be reformed or repealed. This argument is fundamentally flawed. The claims that renewable fuels will increase the cost of energy or that they are worse for the environment are simply ridiculous. Countless independent studies have shown that renewable fuels like ethanol help drive down the cost of fuel. Furthermore, when it comes environmental damage, no one has a worse record than oil companies. Their record of ecological disasters is extensive and deeply troubling. Between 2008 and 2014, more than 25,000 oil spills accounted for more than 217 million gallons of oil and petroleum based products being discharged into U.S. navigable waterways, territorial waters, tributaries, the contiguous zone, onto shoreline, or into other waters and land that threaten the environment. That’s an average of more than 30 million gallons spilled a year. In contrast, ethanol is biodegradable and no beaches have ever been closed due to an ethanol spill.
“They claim the RFS is a ‘relic’ that is no longer useful, but the fact is that the RFS has been a resounding success, doing exactly what it was intended to do when a bipartisan Congress passed it over a decade ago.
“The RFS is the most successful energy policy this nation has enacted in the last 40 years. Not only is it creating jobs, it is revitalizing rural economies, reducing harmful emissions, improving our environment and reducing our dangerous dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuel. Additionally, it is providing consumers with a choice at the pump.
“API notes the importance of consumers in their speech, yet seems to believe the American consumer is best served by denying them a choice. Furthermore, they attempt to distort the truth saying there is no demand for renewable fuels. Yet major retail chains like Sheetz, Kum & Go, MAPCO and others are adopting higher blends and offering them to consumers and seeing tremendous success and growing demand.
“The bottom line is that API wants to kill any competition that may threaten their bottom line and record profits. They will stop at nothing to end the Renewable Fuel Standard, blocking the wide spread adoption of renewable fuels that consumers demand by maintaining the so-called “blend wall” to prevent market access for higher blends of biofuels such as E15 to ensure that their lock on the fuels market goes unchecked.
“The RFS is a win-win for America, as it is an essential part of a true ‘all of the above’ energy strategy needed to meet the growing energy demands of the 21st century.”
Monday January 4 Ag News
Beef Profit Workshop for 2016 at 18 Nebraska Sites this winter
During the winter of 2016 Nebraska Extension will host 18 Beef Profitability Workshops to help beef producers evaluate their operations to make them more profitable thorough the latest research information.
Examples of some of the topics that will be presented at each location by presenters:
*Harvesting crop residues –does it affect future crop yields
*Balancing the Ranch for Protein
*Fencing and Watering Options on Crop Residue
*Mineral Nutrition
*Managing Risk on the Average Sized Cow-Calf operation
*Composting Livestock Carcasses
*Evaluating & Valuing Cull Beef Cows & their Carcasses
*Windrow Grazing
*Cow Deprecation- (2nd largest cost)
*Forage Testing and What the Numbers Mean
*Hay and Land Grazing Rates
*EPDs and Bull Selection
*Global Market Landscape
*Economics in the Beef Industry and Beef Outlook
*Livestock Outlook
A team of UNL Extension Educators, including Steve Pritchard, Larry Howard, Dennis Bauer, Gary Stauffer, Jim Jansen, Steve Tonn, and Steve Niemeyer will present information as well as practical approaches for the beef producer.
These workshops have been held across Nebraska for the past Twelve Years.
Workshops are sponsored by Nebraska Extension. The cost is $15.00 but may vary from location depending on local sponsorship. Pre-Register by calling the local Extension office in the host county at least three days before the workshop to ensure there are enough handouts and refreshments.
Nebraska Extension’s Pesticide Sprayer Nozzle Selection Workshop set for Jan. 15
Nebraska Extension’s Nozzle Selection and Pest Management Practices in Pesticide workshop is Friday, January 15 at the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center near Mead, Nebraska. The workshop is scheduled from 9 :00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
The workshop is presented by Greg Kruger, Nebraska Extension Weed Science and Application Technology Specialist.
Pesticide applications are of critical importance in the U.S. as regulations and restrictions are tightening and as use of dicamba and 2,4-D resistant traits being marketed for POST emergence use in major broadleaf crops commences. Kruger states, “Understanding what nozzles are out there for use, how to apply pesticides optimally and how to maximize the efficacy to prevent or delay resistance is paramount.”
The program will cover the most important factors to consider when trying to minimize pesticide drift. This includes understanding the importance of wind speed, wind direction, boom height, droplet size, and distance to sensitive areas. Participants learn about different tools for monitoring environmental conditions as well as simple things that can be done to mitigate drift incidences.
The program will also cover in depth on nozzle types, nozzle patterns, and droplet size produced from various nozzles. Kruger says, “We will also cover tank mixtures and how they affect droplet size. A discussion on how droplet size can be managed for drift mitigation will also be covered. Examples of how pesticide labels often cover aspect of how to apply the product to maximize efficacy and/or mitigate drift will be shown.”
Kruger says that applications can be altered in terms of carrier rate, droplet size, and spray solution to increase efficacy. The program will cover a range of different products and what can be done to maintain efficacy while mitigating drift or ways to maximize efficacy. After attending the program, participants should have a good comprehension of the applications, application set-ups, drift mitigation and how to maximize applications for efficacy.
The workshop is limited to 50 participants. Pre-register to reserve a seat and ensure materials are available the day of the workshop. Contact Nebraska Extension at (402)624-8000 or cdunbar2@unl.edu. For questions about the program, contact Nebraska Extension Educator Keith Glewen at the above phone number or kglewen1@unl.edu.
NEBRASKA CROP PROGRESS AND CONDITION
For the month of December 2015, temperatures averaged four to six degrees above normal across the eastern half of the State and near normal elsewhere, according to the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service. At mid-month, rainfall accumulations totaled three or more inches across the eastern third of the State. As the month closed, snow cover was present in many areas, limiting fieldwork activities and livestock grazing. The combination of snow and rain left many feedlots muddy until cold temperatures late in the month caused soils to freeze. Topsoil moisture rated 2 percent very short, 13 short, 80 adequate, and 5 surplus. Subsoil moisture rated 3 percent very short, 18 short, 77, and 2 surplus.
Field Crops Report:
Winter wheat condition rated 0 percent very poor, 3 poor, 38 fair, 51 good, and 8 excellent.
Livestock Report:
Cattle and calf conditions rated 0 percent very poor, 0 poor, 13 fair, 75 good, and 12 excellent. Sheep and lamb conditions rated 0 percent very poor, 1 poor, 20 fair, 76 good, and 3 excellent. Hay and roughage supplies rated 1 percent very short, 3 short, 92 adequate, and 4 surplus.
Stock water supplies rated 2 percent very short, 7 short, 89 adequate, and 2 surplus.
ICON CONSIDERS BRAND FEE INCREASE
At the tenth annual convention of Independent Cattlemen of Nebraska (ICON) in Brewster, ICON members considered the recent decision of the Brand Committee to increase brand fees from $0.75 per head to $1 per head for all inspections except registered feedlots which will stay at $0.75 per head.
This increase will be considered by the Nebraska Attorney General to determine if it follows statutory law.
ICON members passed two resolutions during the business meeting which do support the brand fee increase but do not support the registered feedlot exemption from the increase.
“We believe in total equality in the brand inspection program and all feel the only fair increase is a set fee all across the board for all livestock operations,” said ICON Director Chris Abbott. “Our resolutions for the 2015 year support an equal fee.”
ICON members all agreed this fee increase does not follow the state statutes for the Brand Program and unanimously passed the resolutions to support a uniform brand inspection fee. It is felt the new brand fee structure gives an economical advantage to registered feedlot programs and puts independent cattlemen at a disadvantage.
“What is interesting is the registered feedlot program is voluntary,” said ICON president Dave Wright. “So if a feedlot does not like the program, they shouldn’t participate instead of trying to change the fee structure so they are exempt from the increase.”
The Brand Committee have been researching ways to increase revenue so the program can purchase more technology and move into the 21st century.
ICON encourages all livestock owners to contact the Brand Committee, State Senators and the Attorney General’s office to voice their thoughts on this decision.
Thoughts on the Cattle Industry in 2016
Kate Brooks, Assistant Professor
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
The last two years have been a whirlwind of dramatic extremes for the cattle industry. With historically tight supplies in 2014, record prices in every segment of the market were reached. Improvements in drought conditions and unprecedented high cow/calf returns brought about rapid expansion at the end of 2014 and throughout 2015. Cattle numbers and beef production continued to be historically small in 2015. The latest USDA's World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report from December estimates 2015 beef production at 23.7 billion pounds. This is the lowest annul beef production figure since 1993. This past year producers faced major volatility in prices due to any disruption to supply, whether positive or negative, causing large price fluctuations. Prices in the first quarter of 2015 started higher than 2014, but significant declines brought them back closer to 2013 price levels in the second half of 2015.
So what is in store for 2016? In the cattle industry, nothing is certain, but there are some key factors worth mentioning for 2016 and beyond.
Evidence has been pointing to a rapid-pace expansion in 2015 because there are fewer heifers entering the feedyard as well as fewer cull cows going to market. The January 1 Cattle Inventory report will be released on January 29th and will set the stage for 2016. Two factors will contribute to or hinder further expansion in 2016: cow/calf returns based on feeder cattle prices and weather conditions. Current LMIC estimates point to lower cow/calf returns in 2016 with returns over cash costs plus pasture rent near $200/cow. Drought conditions have continued to improve over most of cow/calf country. Continued improvements would continue to contribute to expansion in 2016, but any formations of drought could rapidly slow the pace.
Expansion equates to more beef production in 2016, 2017, and 2018 which also means lower prices. The latest WASDE estimates 2016 beef production will be over 24.7 billion pounds. Larger carcass weights will also contribute to increased beef production; however, due to reduced feedlot placements recently, beef production will be constrained for the first part of 2016. Beef production in 2016 will be higher than 2014 and 2015 but will still be historically low.
The export market was challenging in 2015 and there doesn't appear to be significant changes to improve the export market in 2016. The continued high priced beef coupled with the strengthening U.S. dollar and lower purchasing power of major markets have played a big factor in the export market and will continue to dampen it for 2016. The import market was strong in 2015, but will likely see less beef imports in 2016. Australia has seen a decline in their herd numbers and are recovering from drought; expanding their herds will decline imported beef in 2016. Domestic demand remained relatively good through 2015 but will be an important figure to watch as we move through 2016. Increased supply of beef, pork, and poultry are expected in 2016, but only up about 2% over 2015 according to the latest WASDE with only slight increases in per capita consumption.
Basic supply and demand fundamentals will continue to play out in 2016. Increased beef production equates to declining prices in the pipeline unless domestic and export demand improve significantly. Besides the fundamental market factors, producers need to be aware of other factors that contribute to how the markets will continue to play out in the coming years. These factors include ongoing political issues and trade agreements, we are entering a presidential election year, as well as consumers (both domestic and international) increasing interest in where and how their food is produced.
ACI: Outlook Bleak for Ag Producers, Agribusinesses
Concerns over their current financial situation and expectations for the future have pushed crop and livestock producers’ confidence to an all-time low in the history of DTN/The Progressive Farmer Agriculture Confidence Index (ACI).
According to the latest survey, producers’ overall confidence fell to 92.7 from 99.4 in August and 103.4 a year ago. Concerns over their current situation dropped significantly over the past year from 113.3 last December to 101.5 in August then to 92.2 following this year’s harvest. Farmers’ expectations about the future decreased from 98.0 in August to now 93.1. The value of 100 is considered neutral. Values above 100 indicate optimism, whereas values below signify pessimism.
“This marks the first time in the history of the Ag Confidence Index that each of these measurements has been in the pessimistic range at the same time, and it’s an indication that farmers are facing some hard economic realities,” said DTN Markets Editor Katie Micik, director of the confidence index.
The confidence index, which surveyed 500 crop and livestock producers from Nov. 2 to Nov. 25, measures the sentiments of crop and livestock producers on their overall agriculture sector impressions. Since 2010, DTN/The Progressive Farmer has conducted the ACI three times a year – before planting, before harvest and after harvest. Producers also rate current and long-term input prices and net farm income to gauge their attitudes toward the present situation and future expectations.
Falling crop prices and uncertainty over input costs have farmers concerned about their incomes, noted Micik. In the recent survey, 53 percent of farmers describe input prices as bad, which is up from 48 percent in August, marking the fifth consecutive survey in which the number of farmers rating input prices as bad has increased. Eighty-three percent of farmers surveyed believe input prices will stay the same or get worse over the next 12 months.
According to the ACI, 44 percent rated farm income as bad and 42 percent said income was normal. “For the first time in the index’s history, more producers consider their current farm income as bad than as normal,” said Micik. “Looking forward 12 months, 84 percent believe farm income will stay the same or get even worse, with only 16 percent saying it will improve.”
For just the second time in the index’s history, both crop and livestock producers have a pessimistic confidence score, with crop producers at 91.0 and livestock producers at 96.4. Not surprisingly, market price uncertainty has contributed significantly to this pessimism. “Ag economists believe this period of low crop prices could last for two to three years, which has crop producers gloomy about the future,” said Micik. “As for livestock producers, recent volatility in the cattle and hog futures markets has them concerned.”
Crop producers’ attitudes remain pessimistic on their current situation and future expectations. The index rating on their current situation fell from 92.0 in August to an all-time index low of 86.5, and future expectations also dropped into the pessimistic range from 101.8 before harvest to now 94.1. Livestock producers’ future expectations came in at 90.6, up slightly from 89.3 in August. Their view on the current situation remains in the optimistic range at 105.2, but Micik indicated that this is the lowest number for the category in the index’s history.
Low crop prices also play a role in regional differences in the recent ACI survey. With the combination of low prices and the high concentration of corn and soybean acreage in the Midwest, producers in that region are the most pessimistic about their overall confidence (85.3), current situation (79.8) and future expectations (89.0). The overall index scores were slightly higher in the Southeast (96.8) and Southwest (98.0). Expectations for the future remain solidly pessimistic for producers in the Southeast (87.2) and Southwest (95.3). Unlike Midwest producers, Southeast and Southwest producers still have optimistic ratings for their current situations at 111.1 and 102.1, respectively. Micik believes this is due to greater diversity in farm type and more regional cash prices.
Agribusiness Confidence Index
Agribusiness index scores remain low, but not as historically low as with producers. According to the DTN/The Progressive Farmer Agribusiness Confidence Index, which measured the sentiments of 100 agribusinesses Nov. 12-19, agribusiness confidence continues in the pessimistic range at 98.3, down from 105.5 a year ago but up from 92.0 before this year’s harvest. Agribusinesses surveyed include agronomists, bankers, ag input retailers and suppliers, equipment dealers and crop insurance agents.
While agribusinesses are positive about their present situation, their score fell for the fifth consecutive survey starting with a score of 121.6 in March 2014 to now 106.4, reflecting the general downturn in farm income prospects.
“Expectations for the next year rebounded from a near-record low in the pre-harvest survey as producers have begun purchasing inputs for next year. Yet agribusinesses still remain in the pessimistic range on their future, a sentiment that has not changed the past two years,” said Micik.
Ninety-two percent of agribusinesses described current sales as good or normal, with 87 percent saying current profitability was good or normal. A year ago, 95 percent of agribusinesses said sales were good or normal while nearly as many (93 percent) rated profitability as good or normal. Looking ahead, 56 percent expect sales to remain the same, while 27 percent say sales will get better and 17 percent expect them to get worse.
“There is more hope about the business environment 12 months from now than there was in the pre-harvest survey,” said Micik. “Eighty-three percent of agribusinesses expect profits to remain the same or get better compared to 77 percent in August.”
Now is the Time to Promote Beef
There is good news in 2016 when it comes to beef supply. According to the recent CattleFax 2016 Outlook and Strategies Session, there is more beef available now than a year ago, and growth is expected to continue into the next year. CattleFax, the beef industry's leading information and analysis service, is predicting the biggest production gains for the second half of 2016, as long as Mother Nature cooperates.
Consumer demand for beef remains strong, and foodservice partners are well positioned to reap the benefits. Current price points allow operators to buy beef at a profitable margin. And while prices are still volatile, due to the cattle expansion, the all-time highs are likely behind us.
So what does this mean for the beef checkoff when it comes to assisting foodservice operators in 2016? The checkoff is encouraging foodservice operators to:
Take advantage of lower wholesale prices to highlight beef through promotional activities, limited time offers and specials.
Explore new menu innovations that capitalize on consumers' love affair for steaks and gets the most value for every ounce they buy.
Highlight beef's quality on the menu. Analysts advise operators to opt for Choice versus Select to get the biggest bang for their buck, as a record 70 percent of beef is grading as Choice. Besides, consumers will pay more for what they consider quality or premium meat, including USDA Choice.
Share the beef community's heritage and connection to the land with their guests through story telling on menus, online, social media and more.
Last Call! Apply for the 2017 Corn Board Today
The National Corn Growers Association Nominating Committee will be accepting applications from members for the 2017 Corn Board until 5 p.m. CST this Friday, January 8. Through the Corn Board, members can become an integral part of the organization's leadership. Click here for the application, which provides complete information on requirements, responsibilities and deadlines.
"In my years on the Corn Board, I have enjoyed working with the talented, dedicated volunteers who step forward to lead this organization," said NCGA Chairman and Nominating Committee Chair Martin Barbre. "The willingness of farmers to step forward as volunteer leaders is crucial to NCGA's continued success. A true grassroots organization, NCGA relies upon farmers to volunteer for leadership, helping to shape policy and drive efforts. Serving on the Corn Board empowers farmers and allows them to play an active role in shaping their industry and our collective future."
The NCGA Corn Board represents the organization on all matters while directing both policy and supervising day-to-day operations. Board members serve the organization in a variety of ways. They represent the federation of state organizations, supervise the affairs and activities of NCGA in partnership with the chief executive officer and implement NCGA policy established by the Corn Congress. Members also act as spokespeople for the NCGA and enhance the organization's public standing on all organizational and policy issues.
Nominated candidates will be introduced at the March 2016 Corn Congress meeting, held in conjunction with the Commodity Classic in New Orleans. Corn Board members will be elected at the July 2016 Corn Congress in Washington, and the new terms begin October 1.
For more information, growers may contact Kathy Baker at NCGA's St. Louis office at (636) 733-9004.
USDA Oilseed Crushings, Production, Consumption and Stocks
Soybeans crushed for crude oil was 4.97 million tons in November 2015, compared to 5.10 million tons in October 2015 and 4.04 million tons in September 2015. Crude oil produced was 1.90 billion pounds down 3 percent from October 2015 but up 24 percent from September 2015. Soybean once refined oil production at 1.43 billion pounds during November 2015 decreased 9 percent from October 2015 but increased 3 percent from September 2015.
Canola seeds crushed for crude oil was 128.9 thousand tons in November 2015, compared to 99.1 thousand tons in October 2015 and 184.6 thousand tons in September 2015. Canola crude oil produced was 108.2 million pounds up 33 percent from October 2015 but down 30 percent from September 2015. Canola once refined oil production at 98.1 million pounds during November 2015 was up 18 percent from October 2015 but down 26 percent from September 2015. Cottonseeds crushed for crude oil was 135.7 thousand tons in November 2015, compared to 123.1 thousand tons in October 2015 and 116.5 thousand tons in September 2015. Cottonseed crude oil produced was 42.0 million pounds, up 11 percent from October 2015 and up 16 percent from September 2015. Cottonseed once refined oil production at 49.5 million pounds during November 2015 was up 2 percent from October 2015 and up 5 percent from September 2015.
Edible tallow production was 83.9 million pounds during November 2015, up slightly from October 2015 but down 2 percent from September 2015. Inedible tallow production was 305 million pounds during November 2015, up 11 percent from October 2015 and up 13 percent from September 2015. Technical tallow production was 105.3 million pounds during November 2015, up 27 percent from
October 2015 and up 25 percent from September 2015. Choice white grease production at 116.6 million pounds during November 2015 increased 2 percent from October 2015 but decreased 1 percent from September 2015.
USDA Grain Crushings and Co-Products Production
Total corn consumed for alcohol and other uses was 484.5 million bushels in November 2015. Total corn consumption was down 2 percent from October 2015 but unchanged from November 2014. November usage included 91.6 percent for alcohol and 8.4 percent for other purposes. Corn for beverage alcohol totaled 2.97 million bushels, up 14 percent from October 2015 but down slightly from November 2014. Corn for fuel alcohol, at 435.0 million bushels, was down 1 percent from October 2015 but up slightly from November 2014. Corn consumed in November 2015 for dry milling fuel production and wet milling fuel production was 89.4 percent and 10.6 percent respectively.
Dry mill co-product production of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) was 1.94 million tons during November 2015, down 1 percent from October 2015 but up 9 percent from November 2014. Distillers wet grains (DWG) 65 percent or more moisture was 1.13 million tons in November 2015, down 8 percent from October 2015 and down 17 percent from November 2014.
Wet mill corn gluten feed production was 322.7 thousand tons during November 2015, down 1 percent from October 2015 but up 9 percent from November 2014. Wet corn gluten feed 40 to 60 percent moisture was 289.2 thousand tons in November 2015, down 3 percent from October 2015 and down 9 percent from November 2014.
USDA Announces Commodity Credit Corporation Lending Rates for January 2016
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) today announced interest rates for January 2016. The CCC borrowing rate-based charge for January is 0.625 percent, up from 0.375 percent in December.
The interest rate for crop year commodity loans less than one year disbursed during January is 1.625 percent, up from 1.375 percent in December.
Interest rates for Farm Storage Facility Loans approved for January are as follows, 2.000 percent with seven-year loan terms, unchanged from 2.000 percent in December; 2.250 percent with 10-year loan terms, unchanged from 2.250 percent in December and; 2.375 percent with 12-year loan terms, unchanged from 2.375 percent in December.
Equine Forum Focuses on Industry Collaboration
Forum relies on industry input in order to gain progress within equine health. The Equine Diseases Forum, hosted by the National Institute for Animal Agriculture and the United State Animal Health Association, will bring together equine health experts, industry leaders and horse owners January 19-21, 2016 in Denver, Colo. at the DoubleTree by Hilton.
“The forum is designed to promote engagement between attendees and industry involvement is essential,” said Dr. Peter Timoney, veterinarian and professor at the Gluck Equine Research Center at the University of Kentucky.
This forum is the first of its kind and aims to bring people face-to-face to discuss the issues.
“There are a range of publications speaking on equine disease, however there is no substitute for real dialogue and being able to raise your hand and ask a question or voice a concern,” Timoney said. “Speakers at the forum will be there to facilitate that dialogue, and provide the backdrop of information for the attendees.”
The equine industry is shifting and how breeders, owners and health officials handle disease outbreaks will greatly determine the health of the horse and economics of the industry greatly.
“It’s a changing world,” Timoney said. “Technology is changing, the industry is changing, movement of horses and trade of equine products, as well as the ability of viruses to adapt, rapidly increases the spread of disease. Geographical restrictions no longer limit the spread of disease. Eradication isn’t a onetime fix anymore; there is always room for improvement.”
For more information or to register online go to AnimalAgriculture.org/equineforum or contact the NIAA by calling 719-538-8843 or emailing niaa@animalagriculture.org.
NFU Recognizes Women’s Contributions to Agriculture
National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson today thanked the growing number of women in agriculture – now roughly one million strong and responsible for a $12.9 billion dollar economic impact – for their invaluable contributions to family farming and ranching and noted that their growing presence in farming is vital to the nation’s food security.
“One of the many promising trends in agriculture is the growing presence of women who are using their talents to help strengthen the viability of the family while also supplying food, feed, fuel and fiber to Americans and consumers abroad,” said Johnson. “And their growing presence in agri-business board rooms and as chief operators on family farms is important to the nation’s food security,” he said.
Johnson noted that women have played key roles in Farmers Union since its founding at the turn of the century, having been elected to key leadership roles in the organization’s early years while also representing a significant portion of the 200,000 NFU members nationwide. “Nationally, women make up 30 percent of farmers, and this is reflected within our ranks as a significant and growing proportion of our total membership comes from female farmers,” he said.
Johnson noted that women farm over three hundred million acres in the U.S. and those farms are more likely to be enrolled in conservation programs. Many of these women have been drawn to Farmers Union because of the organization’s progressive stance on many issues important to them, including child nutrition, environmental stewardship and the historic fight for full voting rights for women. “For years, women have found a home in Farmers Union and their inclusion in both leadership and membership positions has ensured a more forward looking, balanced voice in family farming,” he added.
NFU continues to support women in agriculture and develop their leadership skills through the annual NFU Women's Conference. The conference focuses on leadership development and risk management training for women. This year’s conference emphasizes building knowledge and skills related to farm transitions as well as advocacy training. There will be a number of workshops on topics ranging from estate planning to grassroots organizing. The event takes place from Jan. 23 to 27, 2016 in Clearwater Beach, Florida. Registration will remain open until Jan. 15. Discounted early bird registration ends January 5.
The conference builds on NFU’s long track record in offering adult education specifically designed for women in agriculture and provides participants important business management and leadership skills. “Our annual women’s conference seeks to provide the business and farming tools women need to succeed in agriculture,” said Johnson, “while allowing these emerging leaders to network and fine-tune their business acumen.”
AgriBank Pays Quarterly Preferred Stock Dividend
St. Paul-based AgriBank today paid a quarterly cash dividend of $1.7188 per share on its 6.875 percent non-cumulative perpetual class A preferred stock to holders of record as of Dec. 1, 2015.
AgriBank issued $250 million of preferred stock on Oct. 29, 2013 to provide the Bank and the 15-state Farm Credit District it serves with long-term access to high-quality capital, helping ensure the District is well-positioned to meet the long-term growth and credit needs of farmer and rancher customers.
About AgriBank
AgriBank is one of the largest banks within the national Farm Credit System, with more than $95 billion in total assets. Under the Farm Credit System's cooperative structure, AgriBank is primarily owned by 17 affiliated Farm Credit Associations. The AgriBank District covers America's Midwest, a 15-state area stretching from Wyoming to Ohio and Minnesota to Arkansas. About half of the nation's cropland is located within the AgriBank District, providing the Bank and its Association owners with expertise in production agriculture. For more information, visit www.AgriBank.com.
A New Look for AgroLiquid
Today, AgroLiquid has launched a new corporate logo. Our new look aligns AgroLiquid’s visual identity with our mission of providing nutrient management products with unsurpassed application flexibility and all around research-proven performance.
Farming has changed a lot in the past 30 years. Since AgroLiquid’s inception in 1983, new technology and industry advancements have enabled farmers to produce more crops on less land with greater efficiency. AgroLiquid is a leader in developing crop nutrition technologies that have aided in that growth and efficiency.
We are proud of our rich heritage. Like most farming operations, we are a family-owned business. More than three decades ago, our founders committed themselves to producing crop nutrient solutions unlike anything else on the market. Driven by the desire to help the farmer prosper, Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizers were developed upon principles of nutrient synergy, sustainability, and practical agronomy.
Thirty years later, our mission is still to ‘Prosper the Farmer’ and our products are still developed upon the same three principles. AgroLiquid’s third generation of ownership is just as committed to producing crop nutrient solutions unlike anything else on the market. We’re constantly researching, developing, and bringing exciting new technologies to the farm gate that meet the challenges farmers face today. Our logo is new and our name is a lot easier to say, but at our core we are still the same family business committed to bringing farmers the very best crop nutrients available today.
During the winter of 2016 Nebraska Extension will host 18 Beef Profitability Workshops to help beef producers evaluate their operations to make them more profitable thorough the latest research information.
Examples of some of the topics that will be presented at each location by presenters:
*Harvesting crop residues –does it affect future crop yields
*Balancing the Ranch for Protein
*Fencing and Watering Options on Crop Residue
*Mineral Nutrition
*Managing Risk on the Average Sized Cow-Calf operation
*Composting Livestock Carcasses
*Evaluating & Valuing Cull Beef Cows & their Carcasses
*Windrow Grazing
*Cow Deprecation- (2nd largest cost)
*Forage Testing and What the Numbers Mean
*Hay and Land Grazing Rates
*EPDs and Bull Selection
*Global Market Landscape
*Economics in the Beef Industry and Beef Outlook
*Livestock Outlook
A team of UNL Extension Educators, including Steve Pritchard, Larry Howard, Dennis Bauer, Gary Stauffer, Jim Jansen, Steve Tonn, and Steve Niemeyer will present information as well as practical approaches for the beef producer.
These workshops have been held across Nebraska for the past Twelve Years.
Workshops are sponsored by Nebraska Extension. The cost is $15.00 but may vary from location depending on local sponsorship. Pre-Register by calling the local Extension office in the host county at least three days before the workshop to ensure there are enough handouts and refreshments.
Nebraska Extension’s Pesticide Sprayer Nozzle Selection Workshop set for Jan. 15
Nebraska Extension’s Nozzle Selection and Pest Management Practices in Pesticide workshop is Friday, January 15 at the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center near Mead, Nebraska. The workshop is scheduled from 9 :00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
The workshop is presented by Greg Kruger, Nebraska Extension Weed Science and Application Technology Specialist.
Pesticide applications are of critical importance in the U.S. as regulations and restrictions are tightening and as use of dicamba and 2,4-D resistant traits being marketed for POST emergence use in major broadleaf crops commences. Kruger states, “Understanding what nozzles are out there for use, how to apply pesticides optimally and how to maximize the efficacy to prevent or delay resistance is paramount.”
The program will cover the most important factors to consider when trying to minimize pesticide drift. This includes understanding the importance of wind speed, wind direction, boom height, droplet size, and distance to sensitive areas. Participants learn about different tools for monitoring environmental conditions as well as simple things that can be done to mitigate drift incidences.
The program will also cover in depth on nozzle types, nozzle patterns, and droplet size produced from various nozzles. Kruger says, “We will also cover tank mixtures and how they affect droplet size. A discussion on how droplet size can be managed for drift mitigation will also be covered. Examples of how pesticide labels often cover aspect of how to apply the product to maximize efficacy and/or mitigate drift will be shown.”
Kruger says that applications can be altered in terms of carrier rate, droplet size, and spray solution to increase efficacy. The program will cover a range of different products and what can be done to maintain efficacy while mitigating drift or ways to maximize efficacy. After attending the program, participants should have a good comprehension of the applications, application set-ups, drift mitigation and how to maximize applications for efficacy.
The workshop is limited to 50 participants. Pre-register to reserve a seat and ensure materials are available the day of the workshop. Contact Nebraska Extension at (402)624-8000 or cdunbar2@unl.edu. For questions about the program, contact Nebraska Extension Educator Keith Glewen at the above phone number or kglewen1@unl.edu.
NEBRASKA CROP PROGRESS AND CONDITION
For the month of December 2015, temperatures averaged four to six degrees above normal across the eastern half of the State and near normal elsewhere, according to the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service. At mid-month, rainfall accumulations totaled three or more inches across the eastern third of the State. As the month closed, snow cover was present in many areas, limiting fieldwork activities and livestock grazing. The combination of snow and rain left many feedlots muddy until cold temperatures late in the month caused soils to freeze. Topsoil moisture rated 2 percent very short, 13 short, 80 adequate, and 5 surplus. Subsoil moisture rated 3 percent very short, 18 short, 77, and 2 surplus.
Field Crops Report:
Winter wheat condition rated 0 percent very poor, 3 poor, 38 fair, 51 good, and 8 excellent.
Livestock Report:
Cattle and calf conditions rated 0 percent very poor, 0 poor, 13 fair, 75 good, and 12 excellent. Sheep and lamb conditions rated 0 percent very poor, 1 poor, 20 fair, 76 good, and 3 excellent. Hay and roughage supplies rated 1 percent very short, 3 short, 92 adequate, and 4 surplus.
Stock water supplies rated 2 percent very short, 7 short, 89 adequate, and 2 surplus.
ICON CONSIDERS BRAND FEE INCREASE
At the tenth annual convention of Independent Cattlemen of Nebraska (ICON) in Brewster, ICON members considered the recent decision of the Brand Committee to increase brand fees from $0.75 per head to $1 per head for all inspections except registered feedlots which will stay at $0.75 per head.
This increase will be considered by the Nebraska Attorney General to determine if it follows statutory law.
ICON members passed two resolutions during the business meeting which do support the brand fee increase but do not support the registered feedlot exemption from the increase.
“We believe in total equality in the brand inspection program and all feel the only fair increase is a set fee all across the board for all livestock operations,” said ICON Director Chris Abbott. “Our resolutions for the 2015 year support an equal fee.”
ICON members all agreed this fee increase does not follow the state statutes for the Brand Program and unanimously passed the resolutions to support a uniform brand inspection fee. It is felt the new brand fee structure gives an economical advantage to registered feedlot programs and puts independent cattlemen at a disadvantage.
“What is interesting is the registered feedlot program is voluntary,” said ICON president Dave Wright. “So if a feedlot does not like the program, they shouldn’t participate instead of trying to change the fee structure so they are exempt from the increase.”
The Brand Committee have been researching ways to increase revenue so the program can purchase more technology and move into the 21st century.
ICON encourages all livestock owners to contact the Brand Committee, State Senators and the Attorney General’s office to voice their thoughts on this decision.
Thoughts on the Cattle Industry in 2016
Kate Brooks, Assistant Professor
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
The last two years have been a whirlwind of dramatic extremes for the cattle industry. With historically tight supplies in 2014, record prices in every segment of the market were reached. Improvements in drought conditions and unprecedented high cow/calf returns brought about rapid expansion at the end of 2014 and throughout 2015. Cattle numbers and beef production continued to be historically small in 2015. The latest USDA's World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report from December estimates 2015 beef production at 23.7 billion pounds. This is the lowest annul beef production figure since 1993. This past year producers faced major volatility in prices due to any disruption to supply, whether positive or negative, causing large price fluctuations. Prices in the first quarter of 2015 started higher than 2014, but significant declines brought them back closer to 2013 price levels in the second half of 2015.
So what is in store for 2016? In the cattle industry, nothing is certain, but there are some key factors worth mentioning for 2016 and beyond.
Evidence has been pointing to a rapid-pace expansion in 2015 because there are fewer heifers entering the feedyard as well as fewer cull cows going to market. The January 1 Cattle Inventory report will be released on January 29th and will set the stage for 2016. Two factors will contribute to or hinder further expansion in 2016: cow/calf returns based on feeder cattle prices and weather conditions. Current LMIC estimates point to lower cow/calf returns in 2016 with returns over cash costs plus pasture rent near $200/cow. Drought conditions have continued to improve over most of cow/calf country. Continued improvements would continue to contribute to expansion in 2016, but any formations of drought could rapidly slow the pace.
Expansion equates to more beef production in 2016, 2017, and 2018 which also means lower prices. The latest WASDE estimates 2016 beef production will be over 24.7 billion pounds. Larger carcass weights will also contribute to increased beef production; however, due to reduced feedlot placements recently, beef production will be constrained for the first part of 2016. Beef production in 2016 will be higher than 2014 and 2015 but will still be historically low.
The export market was challenging in 2015 and there doesn't appear to be significant changes to improve the export market in 2016. The continued high priced beef coupled with the strengthening U.S. dollar and lower purchasing power of major markets have played a big factor in the export market and will continue to dampen it for 2016. The import market was strong in 2015, but will likely see less beef imports in 2016. Australia has seen a decline in their herd numbers and are recovering from drought; expanding their herds will decline imported beef in 2016. Domestic demand remained relatively good through 2015 but will be an important figure to watch as we move through 2016. Increased supply of beef, pork, and poultry are expected in 2016, but only up about 2% over 2015 according to the latest WASDE with only slight increases in per capita consumption.
Basic supply and demand fundamentals will continue to play out in 2016. Increased beef production equates to declining prices in the pipeline unless domestic and export demand improve significantly. Besides the fundamental market factors, producers need to be aware of other factors that contribute to how the markets will continue to play out in the coming years. These factors include ongoing political issues and trade agreements, we are entering a presidential election year, as well as consumers (both domestic and international) increasing interest in where and how their food is produced.
ACI: Outlook Bleak for Ag Producers, Agribusinesses
Concerns over their current financial situation and expectations for the future have pushed crop and livestock producers’ confidence to an all-time low in the history of DTN/The Progressive Farmer Agriculture Confidence Index (ACI).
According to the latest survey, producers’ overall confidence fell to 92.7 from 99.4 in August and 103.4 a year ago. Concerns over their current situation dropped significantly over the past year from 113.3 last December to 101.5 in August then to 92.2 following this year’s harvest. Farmers’ expectations about the future decreased from 98.0 in August to now 93.1. The value of 100 is considered neutral. Values above 100 indicate optimism, whereas values below signify pessimism.
“This marks the first time in the history of the Ag Confidence Index that each of these measurements has been in the pessimistic range at the same time, and it’s an indication that farmers are facing some hard economic realities,” said DTN Markets Editor Katie Micik, director of the confidence index.
The confidence index, which surveyed 500 crop and livestock producers from Nov. 2 to Nov. 25, measures the sentiments of crop and livestock producers on their overall agriculture sector impressions. Since 2010, DTN/The Progressive Farmer has conducted the ACI three times a year – before planting, before harvest and after harvest. Producers also rate current and long-term input prices and net farm income to gauge their attitudes toward the present situation and future expectations.
Falling crop prices and uncertainty over input costs have farmers concerned about their incomes, noted Micik. In the recent survey, 53 percent of farmers describe input prices as bad, which is up from 48 percent in August, marking the fifth consecutive survey in which the number of farmers rating input prices as bad has increased. Eighty-three percent of farmers surveyed believe input prices will stay the same or get worse over the next 12 months.
According to the ACI, 44 percent rated farm income as bad and 42 percent said income was normal. “For the first time in the index’s history, more producers consider their current farm income as bad than as normal,” said Micik. “Looking forward 12 months, 84 percent believe farm income will stay the same or get even worse, with only 16 percent saying it will improve.”
For just the second time in the index’s history, both crop and livestock producers have a pessimistic confidence score, with crop producers at 91.0 and livestock producers at 96.4. Not surprisingly, market price uncertainty has contributed significantly to this pessimism. “Ag economists believe this period of low crop prices could last for two to three years, which has crop producers gloomy about the future,” said Micik. “As for livestock producers, recent volatility in the cattle and hog futures markets has them concerned.”
Crop producers’ attitudes remain pessimistic on their current situation and future expectations. The index rating on their current situation fell from 92.0 in August to an all-time index low of 86.5, and future expectations also dropped into the pessimistic range from 101.8 before harvest to now 94.1. Livestock producers’ future expectations came in at 90.6, up slightly from 89.3 in August. Their view on the current situation remains in the optimistic range at 105.2, but Micik indicated that this is the lowest number for the category in the index’s history.
Low crop prices also play a role in regional differences in the recent ACI survey. With the combination of low prices and the high concentration of corn and soybean acreage in the Midwest, producers in that region are the most pessimistic about their overall confidence (85.3), current situation (79.8) and future expectations (89.0). The overall index scores were slightly higher in the Southeast (96.8) and Southwest (98.0). Expectations for the future remain solidly pessimistic for producers in the Southeast (87.2) and Southwest (95.3). Unlike Midwest producers, Southeast and Southwest producers still have optimistic ratings for their current situations at 111.1 and 102.1, respectively. Micik believes this is due to greater diversity in farm type and more regional cash prices.
Agribusiness Confidence Index
Agribusiness index scores remain low, but not as historically low as with producers. According to the DTN/The Progressive Farmer Agribusiness Confidence Index, which measured the sentiments of 100 agribusinesses Nov. 12-19, agribusiness confidence continues in the pessimistic range at 98.3, down from 105.5 a year ago but up from 92.0 before this year’s harvest. Agribusinesses surveyed include agronomists, bankers, ag input retailers and suppliers, equipment dealers and crop insurance agents.
While agribusinesses are positive about their present situation, their score fell for the fifth consecutive survey starting with a score of 121.6 in March 2014 to now 106.4, reflecting the general downturn in farm income prospects.
“Expectations for the next year rebounded from a near-record low in the pre-harvest survey as producers have begun purchasing inputs for next year. Yet agribusinesses still remain in the pessimistic range on their future, a sentiment that has not changed the past two years,” said Micik.
Ninety-two percent of agribusinesses described current sales as good or normal, with 87 percent saying current profitability was good or normal. A year ago, 95 percent of agribusinesses said sales were good or normal while nearly as many (93 percent) rated profitability as good or normal. Looking ahead, 56 percent expect sales to remain the same, while 27 percent say sales will get better and 17 percent expect them to get worse.
“There is more hope about the business environment 12 months from now than there was in the pre-harvest survey,” said Micik. “Eighty-three percent of agribusinesses expect profits to remain the same or get better compared to 77 percent in August.”
Now is the Time to Promote Beef
There is good news in 2016 when it comes to beef supply. According to the recent CattleFax 2016 Outlook and Strategies Session, there is more beef available now than a year ago, and growth is expected to continue into the next year. CattleFax, the beef industry's leading information and analysis service, is predicting the biggest production gains for the second half of 2016, as long as Mother Nature cooperates.
Consumer demand for beef remains strong, and foodservice partners are well positioned to reap the benefits. Current price points allow operators to buy beef at a profitable margin. And while prices are still volatile, due to the cattle expansion, the all-time highs are likely behind us.
So what does this mean for the beef checkoff when it comes to assisting foodservice operators in 2016? The checkoff is encouraging foodservice operators to:
Take advantage of lower wholesale prices to highlight beef through promotional activities, limited time offers and specials.
Explore new menu innovations that capitalize on consumers' love affair for steaks and gets the most value for every ounce they buy.
Highlight beef's quality on the menu. Analysts advise operators to opt for Choice versus Select to get the biggest bang for their buck, as a record 70 percent of beef is grading as Choice. Besides, consumers will pay more for what they consider quality or premium meat, including USDA Choice.
Share the beef community's heritage and connection to the land with their guests through story telling on menus, online, social media and more.
Last Call! Apply for the 2017 Corn Board Today
The National Corn Growers Association Nominating Committee will be accepting applications from members for the 2017 Corn Board until 5 p.m. CST this Friday, January 8. Through the Corn Board, members can become an integral part of the organization's leadership. Click here for the application, which provides complete information on requirements, responsibilities and deadlines.
"In my years on the Corn Board, I have enjoyed working with the talented, dedicated volunteers who step forward to lead this organization," said NCGA Chairman and Nominating Committee Chair Martin Barbre. "The willingness of farmers to step forward as volunteer leaders is crucial to NCGA's continued success. A true grassroots organization, NCGA relies upon farmers to volunteer for leadership, helping to shape policy and drive efforts. Serving on the Corn Board empowers farmers and allows them to play an active role in shaping their industry and our collective future."
The NCGA Corn Board represents the organization on all matters while directing both policy and supervising day-to-day operations. Board members serve the organization in a variety of ways. They represent the federation of state organizations, supervise the affairs and activities of NCGA in partnership with the chief executive officer and implement NCGA policy established by the Corn Congress. Members also act as spokespeople for the NCGA and enhance the organization's public standing on all organizational and policy issues.
Nominated candidates will be introduced at the March 2016 Corn Congress meeting, held in conjunction with the Commodity Classic in New Orleans. Corn Board members will be elected at the July 2016 Corn Congress in Washington, and the new terms begin October 1.
For more information, growers may contact Kathy Baker at NCGA's St. Louis office at (636) 733-9004.
USDA Oilseed Crushings, Production, Consumption and Stocks
Soybeans crushed for crude oil was 4.97 million tons in November 2015, compared to 5.10 million tons in October 2015 and 4.04 million tons in September 2015. Crude oil produced was 1.90 billion pounds down 3 percent from October 2015 but up 24 percent from September 2015. Soybean once refined oil production at 1.43 billion pounds during November 2015 decreased 9 percent from October 2015 but increased 3 percent from September 2015.
Canola seeds crushed for crude oil was 128.9 thousand tons in November 2015, compared to 99.1 thousand tons in October 2015 and 184.6 thousand tons in September 2015. Canola crude oil produced was 108.2 million pounds up 33 percent from October 2015 but down 30 percent from September 2015. Canola once refined oil production at 98.1 million pounds during November 2015 was up 18 percent from October 2015 but down 26 percent from September 2015. Cottonseeds crushed for crude oil was 135.7 thousand tons in November 2015, compared to 123.1 thousand tons in October 2015 and 116.5 thousand tons in September 2015. Cottonseed crude oil produced was 42.0 million pounds, up 11 percent from October 2015 and up 16 percent from September 2015. Cottonseed once refined oil production at 49.5 million pounds during November 2015 was up 2 percent from October 2015 and up 5 percent from September 2015.
Edible tallow production was 83.9 million pounds during November 2015, up slightly from October 2015 but down 2 percent from September 2015. Inedible tallow production was 305 million pounds during November 2015, up 11 percent from October 2015 and up 13 percent from September 2015. Technical tallow production was 105.3 million pounds during November 2015, up 27 percent from
October 2015 and up 25 percent from September 2015. Choice white grease production at 116.6 million pounds during November 2015 increased 2 percent from October 2015 but decreased 1 percent from September 2015.
USDA Grain Crushings and Co-Products Production
Total corn consumed for alcohol and other uses was 484.5 million bushels in November 2015. Total corn consumption was down 2 percent from October 2015 but unchanged from November 2014. November usage included 91.6 percent for alcohol and 8.4 percent for other purposes. Corn for beverage alcohol totaled 2.97 million bushels, up 14 percent from October 2015 but down slightly from November 2014. Corn for fuel alcohol, at 435.0 million bushels, was down 1 percent from October 2015 but up slightly from November 2014. Corn consumed in November 2015 for dry milling fuel production and wet milling fuel production was 89.4 percent and 10.6 percent respectively.
Dry mill co-product production of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) was 1.94 million tons during November 2015, down 1 percent from October 2015 but up 9 percent from November 2014. Distillers wet grains (DWG) 65 percent or more moisture was 1.13 million tons in November 2015, down 8 percent from October 2015 and down 17 percent from November 2014.
Wet mill corn gluten feed production was 322.7 thousand tons during November 2015, down 1 percent from October 2015 but up 9 percent from November 2014. Wet corn gluten feed 40 to 60 percent moisture was 289.2 thousand tons in November 2015, down 3 percent from October 2015 and down 9 percent from November 2014.
USDA Announces Commodity Credit Corporation Lending Rates for January 2016
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) today announced interest rates for January 2016. The CCC borrowing rate-based charge for January is 0.625 percent, up from 0.375 percent in December.
The interest rate for crop year commodity loans less than one year disbursed during January is 1.625 percent, up from 1.375 percent in December.
Interest rates for Farm Storage Facility Loans approved for January are as follows, 2.000 percent with seven-year loan terms, unchanged from 2.000 percent in December; 2.250 percent with 10-year loan terms, unchanged from 2.250 percent in December and; 2.375 percent with 12-year loan terms, unchanged from 2.375 percent in December.
Equine Forum Focuses on Industry Collaboration
Forum relies on industry input in order to gain progress within equine health. The Equine Diseases Forum, hosted by the National Institute for Animal Agriculture and the United State Animal Health Association, will bring together equine health experts, industry leaders and horse owners January 19-21, 2016 in Denver, Colo. at the DoubleTree by Hilton.
“The forum is designed to promote engagement between attendees and industry involvement is essential,” said Dr. Peter Timoney, veterinarian and professor at the Gluck Equine Research Center at the University of Kentucky.
This forum is the first of its kind and aims to bring people face-to-face to discuss the issues.
“There are a range of publications speaking on equine disease, however there is no substitute for real dialogue and being able to raise your hand and ask a question or voice a concern,” Timoney said. “Speakers at the forum will be there to facilitate that dialogue, and provide the backdrop of information for the attendees.”
The equine industry is shifting and how breeders, owners and health officials handle disease outbreaks will greatly determine the health of the horse and economics of the industry greatly.
“It’s a changing world,” Timoney said. “Technology is changing, the industry is changing, movement of horses and trade of equine products, as well as the ability of viruses to adapt, rapidly increases the spread of disease. Geographical restrictions no longer limit the spread of disease. Eradication isn’t a onetime fix anymore; there is always room for improvement.”
For more information or to register online go to AnimalAgriculture.org/equineforum or contact the NIAA by calling 719-538-8843 or emailing niaa@animalagriculture.org.
NFU Recognizes Women’s Contributions to Agriculture
National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson today thanked the growing number of women in agriculture – now roughly one million strong and responsible for a $12.9 billion dollar economic impact – for their invaluable contributions to family farming and ranching and noted that their growing presence in farming is vital to the nation’s food security.
“One of the many promising trends in agriculture is the growing presence of women who are using their talents to help strengthen the viability of the family while also supplying food, feed, fuel and fiber to Americans and consumers abroad,” said Johnson. “And their growing presence in agri-business board rooms and as chief operators on family farms is important to the nation’s food security,” he said.
Johnson noted that women have played key roles in Farmers Union since its founding at the turn of the century, having been elected to key leadership roles in the organization’s early years while also representing a significant portion of the 200,000 NFU members nationwide. “Nationally, women make up 30 percent of farmers, and this is reflected within our ranks as a significant and growing proportion of our total membership comes from female farmers,” he said.
Johnson noted that women farm over three hundred million acres in the U.S. and those farms are more likely to be enrolled in conservation programs. Many of these women have been drawn to Farmers Union because of the organization’s progressive stance on many issues important to them, including child nutrition, environmental stewardship and the historic fight for full voting rights for women. “For years, women have found a home in Farmers Union and their inclusion in both leadership and membership positions has ensured a more forward looking, balanced voice in family farming,” he added.
NFU continues to support women in agriculture and develop their leadership skills through the annual NFU Women's Conference. The conference focuses on leadership development and risk management training for women. This year’s conference emphasizes building knowledge and skills related to farm transitions as well as advocacy training. There will be a number of workshops on topics ranging from estate planning to grassroots organizing. The event takes place from Jan. 23 to 27, 2016 in Clearwater Beach, Florida. Registration will remain open until Jan. 15. Discounted early bird registration ends January 5.
The conference builds on NFU’s long track record in offering adult education specifically designed for women in agriculture and provides participants important business management and leadership skills. “Our annual women’s conference seeks to provide the business and farming tools women need to succeed in agriculture,” said Johnson, “while allowing these emerging leaders to network and fine-tune their business acumen.”
AgriBank Pays Quarterly Preferred Stock Dividend
St. Paul-based AgriBank today paid a quarterly cash dividend of $1.7188 per share on its 6.875 percent non-cumulative perpetual class A preferred stock to holders of record as of Dec. 1, 2015.
AgriBank issued $250 million of preferred stock on Oct. 29, 2013 to provide the Bank and the 15-state Farm Credit District it serves with long-term access to high-quality capital, helping ensure the District is well-positioned to meet the long-term growth and credit needs of farmer and rancher customers.
About AgriBank
AgriBank is one of the largest banks within the national Farm Credit System, with more than $95 billion in total assets. Under the Farm Credit System's cooperative structure, AgriBank is primarily owned by 17 affiliated Farm Credit Associations. The AgriBank District covers America's Midwest, a 15-state area stretching from Wyoming to Ohio and Minnesota to Arkansas. About half of the nation's cropland is located within the AgriBank District, providing the Bank and its Association owners with expertise in production agriculture. For more information, visit www.AgriBank.com.
A New Look for AgroLiquid
Today, AgroLiquid has launched a new corporate logo. Our new look aligns AgroLiquid’s visual identity with our mission of providing nutrient management products with unsurpassed application flexibility and all around research-proven performance.
Farming has changed a lot in the past 30 years. Since AgroLiquid’s inception in 1983, new technology and industry advancements have enabled farmers to produce more crops on less land with greater efficiency. AgroLiquid is a leader in developing crop nutrition technologies that have aided in that growth and efficiency.
We are proud of our rich heritage. Like most farming operations, we are a family-owned business. More than three decades ago, our founders committed themselves to producing crop nutrient solutions unlike anything else on the market. Driven by the desire to help the farmer prosper, Agro-Culture Liquid Fertilizers were developed upon principles of nutrient synergy, sustainability, and practical agronomy.
Thirty years later, our mission is still to ‘Prosper the Farmer’ and our products are still developed upon the same three principles. AgroLiquid’s third generation of ownership is just as committed to producing crop nutrient solutions unlike anything else on the market. We’re constantly researching, developing, and bringing exciting new technologies to the farm gate that meet the challenges farmers face today. Our logo is new and our name is a lot easier to say, but at our core we are still the same family business committed to bringing farmers the very best crop nutrients available today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)