Nebraska Crop Progress & Condition Statistics - July 05
Very Short Short Adequate Surplus
Topsoil Moisture .......: 15 34 45 06
Subsoil Moisture .......: 26 36 34 04
Last year Last week This week 5YrAve
Corn Silking...................: 09 03 10 09
Corn in Dough................: 01 na -- --
Soybeans in bloom.........: 13 26 49 33
Soybeans setting pods....: -- -- 06 02
Sorghum headed ............: 04 04 05 04
Winter Wheat Harvested: 19 05 25 17
VP Poor Fair Good Excellent
Corn Condition Rating ...: 02 04 32 48 14
Soybean Condition Rating 01 04 29 52 14
Winter Wheat Condition .: 61 32 05 02 -
Pasture Conditions ..........: 32 32 29 6 1
Iowa Crop Progress and Condition Report
Farmers had 4.2 days suitable for fieldwork during the week ending July 5, 2026. This is 0.6 days less than last year, when there were 4.8 days suitable for fieldwork. Topsoil moisture condition rated 1 percent very short, 10 percent short, 71 percent adequate, and 18 percent surplus. Subsoil moisture condition rated 3 percent very short, 16 percent short, 65 percent adequate, and 16 percent surplus.
Corn silking in Iowa reached 8 percent, which is 5 percentage points behind last year. Corn condition rated 78 percent good to excellent.
Soybeans blooming reached 37 percent, which is 3 percentage points ahead of last year. Soybeans setting pods reached 3 percent, which is 5 percentage points behind last year. Soybean condition rated 74 percent good to excellent.
Oats headed reached 96 percent, which is 3 percentage points ahead of last year. Oats condition rated 82 percent good to excellent.
Pasture condition rated 73 percent good to excellent.
USDA Weekly Crop Progress Report
U.S. corn good-to-excellent condition ratings were unchanged while soybean good-to-excellent condition ratings declined from the previous week, according to USDA NASS's weekly Crop Progress report released Monday.
CORN
-- Crop development: Corn silking was pegged at 16%, 1 percentage point behind last year's 17% and 2 percentage points ahead of the five-year average of 14%. Corn in the dough stage was estimated at 3%, steady with last year and slightly ahead of the five-year average of 2%.
-- Crop condition: NASS estimated that 67% of the crop was in good-to-excellent condition, steady with the previous week and 7 points below last year's 74%. Eight percent of the crop was rated very poor to poor, steady with the previous week and 3 points above the previous year's 5%.
SOYBEANS
-- Crop development: Soybeans blooming was pegged at 34%, 4 points ahead of last year's 30% and 6 points ahead of the five-year average of 28%. Soybeans setting pods were estimated at 9%, 2 points ahead of last year's 7% and 3 points ahead of the five-year average of 6%.
-- Crop condition: NASS estimated that 64% of soybeans that had emerged were in good-to-excellent condition, 1 point below the previous week of 65% and 2 points below the previous year of 66%.
WINTER WHEAT
-- Harvest progress: Harvest moved ahead 11 percentage points last week to reach 59% complete nationwide as of Sunday. That was 8 points ahead of last year and the five-year average of 51%.
-- Crop condition: An estimated 26% of winter wheat was rated good to excellent as of July 5, steady with the previous week and 22 points below 48% a year ago, according to NASS.
SPRING WHEAT
-- Crop development: Fifty-four percent of spring wheat was headed, 4 points behind last year's pace of 58% and steady with the five-year average.
-- Crop condition: NASS estimated that 57% of the crop was in good-to-excellent condition nationwide, down 2 points from 59% the previous week.
-----
Soybean Gall Midge Alert: July 6th, 2026
Nebraska Extension
Soybean gall midge activity continues to increase in parts of the monitoring network.
In Nebraska, first-generation adults (current year’s soybean) have begun emerging almost all monitoring sites, indicating the next generation is underway. Wilting and dead soybean plants are now present at all monitored locations, with infestations ranging from 10–90% of plants along field borders depending on the site.
Minnesota has now documented soybean gall midge larvae, with 40–50% of plants infested along the field border at a monitoring site in Rock County, MN. Wilting and dead soybean plants have also been observed at the same site.
See map on soybeangallmidge.org
Producers should continue scouting soybean fields, especially field edges adjacent to last year's soybean fields. Once significant larval infestations are present, insecticide applications are not recommended because larvae are protected within the stem, making it difficult for insecticides to reach them effectively.
Soil Health Assessment Training Set for Aug. 20
Healthy soils start with knowing what is happening below the surface. Producers, agronomists and ag professionals can sharpen their observation, measurement and management skills this August during a hands-on soil health assessment training.
The UNL Soil Health team is hosting “From Field Sampling to Soil Health Scores,” a hands-on soil health assessment training followed by a cover crop demo tour, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 20 at Rogers Memorial Farm. This in-person training is designed for producers with or without an RCPP/RPP contract, agronomists, Certified Crop Advisors, and other agricultural professionals seeking practical soil health assessment skills.
Participants will work through the full soil health assessment process, from sampling design to interpreting soil health scores for management decisions using real field conditions.
During this training, participants will learn how to:
Design efficient soil sampling plans by identifying representative sampling locations (by soil type, management and resource concern).
Conduct on-site soil health assessments and soil sampling following nationwide guidelines (e.g., NRCS CEMA 216 and Technical Note 450).
Record and organize field data and prepare soil samples for lab analysis.
Calculate and interpret soil health indicators and connect field observations.
Apply results to inform conservation planning and management decisions.
The day includes instruction, demonstration, and small-group field practice. Participants will collect and assess soil samples, compare observations across sites, discuss how field and lab data align, and use soil health framework scoring frameworks, such as SHAPE, to guide practical next steps for improving and maintaining soil health.
Registration is free, with participants encouraged to sign up by Monday, Aug. 10 https://unlcorexmuw.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_a2BE9XiSESVztPw. Attendance is limited to 25 participants to ensure an interactive experience.
Lunch and a soil health kit valued at $100 will be provided to all participants.
This workshop offers a valuable opportunity to build hands-on skills, connect data to decision-making, and support farmers in developing resilient, healthy soils.
For questions or more information, contact Miranda Mueller, Soil Health Program coordinator, 402-472-4067, or Caro Córdova, soil health specialist, 402-472-6229.
This event is offered at no cost thanks to sponsorship from the Nebraska Department of Water, Energy, and Environment, Nebraska Soybean Board and the UNL Soil Health Program.
Rogers Memorial Farm is located at 18600 Adam St., Lincoln, NE 68527.
Soybean Herbicide Application Restrictions by Growth Stage and Pre-Harvest Interval
Amit Jhala - Professor and Associate Department Head, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture
Early-season weed control is crucial to prevent crop-weed competition and potential yield loss, especially in soybean, where effective post-emergence herbicides are limited. When adequate soil moisture and warm temperatures promote rapid weed germination and growth, soybean fields can quickly develop dense weed infestations (Figure 1) that require timely post-emergence herbicide application for effective control in no-till soybean production system.
When applying post-emergence herbicides, it is essential to consider the soybean growth stage or pre-harvest interval to avoid soybean injury and herbicide residue in the seeds. Herbicide labels specify the maximum soybean growth stage at which broadcast herbicide applications can be made (see Table 1), and these guidelines should be followed closely. When using a mixture of herbicides, always adhere to the most restrictive label instructions among all products included.
How to Determine Soybean Growth Stage
Restrictions on postemergence herbicide applications in soybean are based on the growth stage or the pre-harvest interval (PHI).
These restrictions are typically expressed as a specific soybean growth stage or PHI, and sometimes both are provided. When both are listed, follow the most restrictive requirement.
After the emergence of the first pair of unifoliolate (single) leaves, all subsequent leaves are trifoliate leaves (compound leaves with three leaflets). Vegetative (V) growth stages are determined by counting the number of fully developed trifoliate leaves on the main stem, not on branches.
The V1 stage occurs when the first trifoliate has fully unrolled and the leaf edges no longer touch. New trifoliates typically emerge every three to five days through the V5 stage. For example, a plant with five fully developed trifoliates is at V5. Beyond V5, trifoliates may emerge more rapidly, approximately every two to three days, under favorable growing conditions.
The R1 (beginning bloom) stage is defined by the appearance of at least one open flower at any node on the main stem. This typically corresponds to plants in the V6 to V8 range and approximately 15–18 inches tall. The R2 (full bloom) stage occurs when open flowers are present at one of the top two nodes of the main stem with a fully developed leaf.
When the first pod on one of the four upper nodes reaches 3/16-inch long, the plant is at the R3 stage. Most post-emergence soybean herbicides have restrictions up to the R3 growth stage. Certain herbicides can be applied later in the season when the restriction is based on pre-harvest interval. For example, Select MAX can be applied as long as you can maintain 60 days of pre-harvest interval.
At the R4 stage, the soybean plant reaches the full pod stage.
Before applying, ensure the trait package in the soybean variety matches the herbicides.
When using herbicide mixtures, always follow the most restrictive label directions among of the products being used in the mixture.
Use labeled adjuvants with post-emergence application of herbicides. Refer to page 71 in the Nebraska Extension NebGuide EC130, “Guide for Weed, Disease, and Insect Management in Nebraska”, link is here: https://marketplace.unl.edu/extension/2026-guide-to-weed-management-18555.html.
2026 Farmland Leasing Arrangements Meetings Offered Across Iowa
Iowa State University Extension and Outreach will offer a series of farmland leasing arrangements meetings across the state in late July and August, as well as a statewide virtual webinar on Aug. 19. The annual meetings are designed to address questions that landowners, tenants, agribusiness professionals and those involved in farmland ownership have about leasing farmland.
Workshop topics will cover land values, market outlook and cash rent trends, costs of production, methods for determining a fair rental rate, legal updates regarding leases and strategies for effective communication with tenants or landowners. ISU Extension and Outreach farm management field specialists will also address common questions regarding leases affected by a farm estate or succession plan.
According to Ann Johanns, program specialist for Ag Decision Maker at ISU Extension and Outreach, the 2026 annual survey of cash rental rates for Iowa farmland showed little change overall, with the state average rate decreasing by 0.4% in 2026 to $270 per acre. This is the second decline in cash rents since 2019, after a peak of $279 per acre in 2023 and 2024.
“While the trend in rental rates is fairly flat, every lease agreement is unique, and attending a workshop is a great way to learn more or ask questions on specific aspects of farm lease arrangements,” said Johanns. “More than half of Iowa’s farmland is rented, and strong landowner/tenant relationships are important for the long-term viability of Iowa’s valuable farmland.”
Attendees often participate in this meeting series annually, each with different goals. In post-session evaluations in 2025, 100% of respondents reported satisfaction with the program’s ability to meet their needs. Past participants shared that they attended to deepen their understanding of factors affecting farmland leases. After attending, many made improvements to their own lease agreements or reported that the session confirmed their current leases aligned with all parties’ needs.
Attend a local meeting
Registration for local county farmland leasing meetings is $25 per person, which includes workshop materials. Pre-registration is encouraged, as an additional fee may be added if registering less than two calendar days before the meeting date. To register, call the hosting ISU Extension and Outreach county office.
Meetings include:
Monday, August 10, 2026 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM
Sac County Extension, 620 Park Ave Sac City, IA 50583
Contact Lauri Niehaus (712) 662-7131
Monday, August 10, 2026 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM
Ida County Extension, 209 1/2 Moorehead Avenue Ida Grove, IA 51445
Contact Krista Lukins (712) 364-3003
Tursday, August 20, 2026 1:30 PM - 4:00 PM
Carroll County Extension Office, 1205 West US Hwy 30, Suite G Carroll, IA 51401
Contact Julee Grell (712) 792-2364
Attend the statewide webinar
If you are unable to attend an in-person meeting, a statewide virtual webinar will take place on Aug. 19 from 9 to 11:30 a.m. Online registration is required https://go.iastate.edu/FLA4WEB, and the registration fee is $25 per individual.
For more information, contact your farm management specialist or county office.
USDA Launches New Online Scheduling Tool to Better Serve Farmers and Ranchers
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is putting farmers first by offering them a new option to schedule appointments online with their local Farm Service Agency (FSA) office. Following a successful pilot program, FSA is now using a digital appointment platform across the agency to allow producers to make farm program or farm loan appointments online at their convenience.
“Farmers and ranchers work around the clock and should be able to schedule appointments with their local offices at their convenience,” said FSA Administrator Bill Beam. “This new online scheduling option gives producers another way to connect with their local FSA office to access the programs and services they depend on. It's one more step in our commitment to putting farmers first.”
Producers can schedule appointments through FSA’s digital platform, Microsoft Bookings, using a mobile device, tablet, laptop or desktop computer. To assist producers in finding their local FSA office to make an appointment, FSA has also launched a new FSA County Office locator that is searchable by state and by county. Each county office contact page has a unique link for producers to make an appointment online and shows contact information for the local FSA office and the farm loan team. Appointments may be in-person or virtual with the local FSA office depending on producer preference.
Producers can conveniently schedule appointments for a variety of services with both farm program and farm loan staff. The Bookings-based system will automatically send a confirmation email to the producer along with reminder emails for upcoming appointments. Producers still have the option to call or visit their local FSA office in person to make an appointment.
For more information, producers can contact their local FSA office.
Growth Energy Backs U.S. Penalties Against Brazil for Unfair Trade Practices
Growth Energy, the nation’s largest biofuel trade association, testified Monday in favor of proposed penalties for Brazil’s unfair restrictions on imports of U.S. ethanol. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is hosting a hearing on the issue following a year-long investigation into Brazil’s trade practices. Growth Energy also filed written comments earlier this month, welcoming USTR’s proposal to impose tariffs of 25 percent on all goods from Brazil and calling for additional actions to repair the harm Brazil has caused U.S. farmers and ethanol producers.
“Brazil has been systematically working to undermine the U.S. bioeconomy since 2017, all while enjoying complete and unfettered access to American markets,” explained Growth Energy’s Chris Bliley, Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs in written testimony. “We support the administration’s efforts to restore balance to our trade relationship with Brazil. To that end, we’re encouraging USTR to go beyond the proposed tariff, and take additional actions to end deceptive practices designed to disguise illegal deforestation by Brazilian producers and block U.S. products from participating in clean fuel markets.”
Among other remedies, Growth Energy is calling on USTR to work with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to remove Brazilian ethanol’s ability to generate credits under the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). Currently, RenovaBio, Brazil’s renewable fuel program, effectively blocks U.S. biofuels, even as Brazilian ethanol receives favorable treatment under the U.S. program.
"Brazil continues to stoke unfounded claims about land use change attributed to U.S. ethanol—yet the land use change and deforestation continue in Brazil. And remarkably, we are charged a land use change penalty by regulators both here and abroad for things that are occurring in Brazil," Bliley will say in his verbal testimony. "These unfounded penalties directly harm our ethanol exports to the United Kingdom, Japan, and the European Union and are inherent barriers to the use of U.S. ethanol as a marine or sustainable aviation fuel. All while Brazil continues to seek a free pass for its own producers. It makes no sense."
RFA Supports Trump Administration Response to Brazil’s Unfair Trade Practices
In testimony Monday at the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Renewable Fuels Association expressed its gratitude to the Trump administration for its “steadfast commitment to removing unfair barriers to U.S. ethanol exports shipped to Brazil and around the globe” and noted it “strongly supports” the reciprocal tariff applied to imports from Brazil.
“Prior to the implementation of punitive trade barriers, Brazil and the United States enjoyed an open and efficient two-way trading relationship in ethanol, which resulted in our two nations experiencing a dramatic increase in bilateral ethanol trade,” said RFA General Counsel and Vice President, Government Affairs Ed Hubbard. “However, beginning in 2017, Brazil unilaterally began abandoning this mutually beneficial approach, instead turning to a pro-tariff policy, clearly erected in an effort to disadvantage U.S. ethanol imports.”
As a result of this newly applied tariff regime, the value of U.S. fuel ethanol exports to Brazil fell to zero in 2023, just $43 million in 2024 and $68 million in 2025, Hubbard added. U.S. ethanol exports to Brazil accounted for just 1.3 percent of total U.S. ethanol exports in 2024 and 1.8 percent of exports in 2025, after accounting for approximately one-third of total U.S. exports as recently as 2018.
Hubbard also pointed to Brazil’s implementation of its “RenovaBio” national biofuels policy, which is designed to reduce the carbon intensity of Brazil’s transportation fuel matrix, as another example of Brazil’s discriminatory trade practices. The RenovaBio program is expected to generate 5 billion gallons of new biofuel demand in Brazil through 2030. However, after five years of implementation, not a single U.S. ethanol plant has received a full certification from the Brazilian government to generate credits under the RenovaBio program.
How Big Will Cattle Get This Year?
Charley Martinez,
Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics
University of Tennessee
Through the first half of the year, year -to- date cattle slaughter is 8.7% lower than last year, and placements have been higher this year compared to last year. These two stats provide information about current and future beef production. Another insightful/helpful stat is dressed weight. As supplies have become lower in the last 2 years, dressed weights have increased to help offset the lower slaughter amounts. Weights have increased so much; in March we hit a record average dressed weight of 902 pounds across all cattle. But, as we get into the dog days of summer, we can expect annual lows and then an increase the rest of the year, but how high will dressed weights go?
The increased weight pattern in dressed cattle weights remains obvious in 2026, but weights are running well above both the 2020–2024 average and 2025 levels. The five-year average (2020–2024) declined from about 833 pounds in January to a seasonal low of approximately 812 pounds in June, before recovering to approximately 838–839 pounds in November and December. In contrast, 2025 started near 877 pounds in January, slipped to a low of about 865 pounds in June, and then increased steadily through the second half of the year to roughly 895 pounds in December. The 2026 series begin at approximately 896 pounds in January, reached an early peak near 902 pounds in March, and remains near 899 pounds through May. Thus, 2026 weights are currently running about 20–30 pounds heavier than 2025 and roughly 65–85 pounds above the 2020–2024 average during the same months. If the 2026 vs 2025 difference holds, we could see 915-925 average dressed weights at the end of the year.
From a market perspective, these exceptionally heavy carcass weights continue to partially offset the effects of historically tight cattle supplies. With the U.S. cattle inventory remaining constrained, feeders appear to be adding weight to available marketings, likely reflecting strong feeding margins, improved feeding performance, and incentives to maximize beef output per head. The weights also highlight the continued economic value of efficient weight gain, although sustained record-heavy carcasses could eventually pressure grading performance, feeding costs, and optimal market timing if carcass discounts emerge. Overall, the 2026 data indicate that carcass weights remain a key mechanism through which the industry is adapting to the current low-inventory cattle cycle.